STALLS
The Dress Circle overhangs the stalls at row N, the top of the stage is
not visible from row S back, and rows V to XX suffer from feeling very
enclosed by the low ceiling.The stalls are split into central and two side blocks by aisles. The
rake becomes noticeable in row F and is good enough to allow fine views
from many seats.
Rows A to C are restricted view for most children and shorter adults,
as the stage is high and they cannot see the back of it. The box office
tries not to sell these seats to young people for that reason, and warns
all buyers - a laudable policy which avoids problems, feels the monkey.
The prices charged do not always account for this problem, though.
At performances where these seats are full price, monkey advice is
perhaps to sit further back unless your have a particular liking for
front row seating. For shorter visitors, further back is the way to go
generally, of course.
The orchestra conductor is in front of central seats in row A / B.
Below stage height some purists might wish to know that while conducting
the person can be seen from most central seats. Don't sit in row A / B, and avoid
central stalls if that
kind of thing bothers you particularly.
When in use (as cheap 'day seats' for "The Wizard of Oz" in February 2011) row A seats do have a neck-achingly steep look
upwards at the stage, and you may miss a little plot by not seeing fully
feet in slippers and yellow roads initially. Row A 1, 2, 23, 24 and 25 also have a
wall directly in front of them, making them the least desirable.
Luckily, these five seats are not on sale. Legroom
is about adequate for all up to around 5ft 9 or so, best in the centre
block. Bear in mind that there is no stretching space ahead of these
seats.
A reader at "The Wizard Of Oz" indeed says,
"A7 and A8: I’d say they remains the pick of the day seats, being just
off centre (no conductor’s head in the way) and on an aisle (enabling a
longer legged person like me to stretch out). The yellow brick road is
barely visible from so close to the front, but in this production isn’t
as integral to the plot as you’d perhaps guess. So the front row seats
would have a big vivid green hue in my opinion but for one flaw. The
orchestra is more visible from these seats than previously (certainly
much more visible than for 'Sister Act') and there was much rolling of
eyes, face-pulling and yawning from some of them during the more
saccharine scenes - not what I’d exactly call professional."
For "Sister Act," when these seats were also sold cheaply, one reader
comments,
"Got a day seat for £25 - seat A14, this seat for the price is a BARGAIN
at 6ft5 there was more then enough leg room to sit comfortably and could
see virtually 99% of all the stage action! and speaking to a woman next
to me who was 5ft6 she said her view was fantastic too!"
Reader Kirsty also rates the view from A14, "fantastic."
4ft 11 tall reader Rebecca notes,
"I saw 'Sister Act' several times from the front row (centre section).
Leg room is acceptable, and maybe slightly above normal from my
experience. The stage is very close so occasionally footwork from those
at the back is cut off, but with 'Sister Act' that's not important. This
is my favourite seat in the theatre, but does require some slouching and
neck bending, especially in the opening of the show where the actors
spend some time above the stage. Recommended from me."
Another reader adds for that same event,
"Got to the box office at 4pm and my friends and I got 5 seats centre
front row. I was in A12. For £25 it was just perfect! The stage isn't
overly high and I could see pretty much everything. Because I couldn't
see the stage floor the set was so magical because it just appeared, I
had no idea where it was coming from which made it spectacular!!!
Definitely recommend sitting here for this show"
while another says, in summary,
"A7: The front row is the way to see this show!"
The monkey upgraded the value rating on the strength of this.
Reader Elaine comments,
"I was lucky enough to get A16 and 17, which is slightly off centre (so
the conductor was not in our way) but not too far to the side for much
action to be obstructed by actors' backs."
Another readers says,
"We got front row seats A8, A9, A10 (cheap as 'day seats' when "The
Sound Of Music" was playing in 2006). These were fabulous viewing - the
view was fine, can't see the people's feet but not that you would want
to!!!"
Reader Angela Xu opines,
"I noticed some comments on the site about the front row seats being too
close to the stage and hence problematic for shorter adults- would like
to say that there is really no real issue- I am 5'2 and enjoyed the show
("The Sound Of Music" in 2006) thoroughly from Seat A8. there were a
couple of kids sitting in the same row and I didn't notice them sitting
on bolster seats or craning their necks at all! for 20 pounds the day
seats are amazingly good value for money!"
As cheap seats the monkey likes 5 to 21 best of these, for central /
least obstructed views.
Further along, reader Kirsty says for "Sister Act,":
"A23 and 24: It was brilliant being sat so close, as I got to look more
closely at facial expressions and costume detail. Good value for money
but, being right at the side, you do miss some of the action on the far
left of the stage and right at the back as the stage is very high."
at the same show, reader Mark felt he was lucky,
"A1: Seeing as though all the front row are top price for Whoopi
Goldberg's run (August 2010) except A1, 2, 24 and 25, I felt that my
seat was a STEAL at £25. I went in on the off chance they had a single
cheap upper circle seat left and got offered this seat when I asked for
the absolute cheapest single seat. I was extremely impressed with it,
especially as I was SO close to Whoopi when she came out. Excellent
value."
The side block seats are almost all situated outside the proscenium.
Most readers feel that only the last 4 seats in each row should be
avoided totally in these blocks, though purists may want to make that 8
to be on the safe side. Boxes overhang these seats back to row N, and
the supporting pillars won't enhance enjoyment of those in N1 much...and
in N47 may be a minor irritant too. Not blocking a view, just a heavy
presence by the seat.
Note that those in the front four rows or so of the side blocks may find
actors backs blocking the view for a few short sequences of a
production. Go for seats from G back to minimise the issue.
“The Wizard of Oz” (April 2011) also has row B and the end 4 seats back to row F,
and the end 2 seats in rows G, H and I at a very large discount. These
ARE NOT suitable for 'first time' visitors, and row B in particular is
NOT for children or those shorter than 5ft 5 or so - you won't see some
elements of the production or the dog for much of the performance.
Still, the centre of row B is a decent bargain for those willing to
accept this. Of the seats to the sides, the 'low numbers'
side has the slightly better view, the monkey feels. It noted
particularly rows E and F 1 to 4 as having decent views for the prices
charged. F is better, and the person in F2 will probably feel the
smuggest.
With the newly lowered stage, reader Luke at "The Wizard Of Oz"
(February 2011) says of his June visit,
"B 14 and 15: I paid £25 each. After reading the reviews from the Monkey
(before the stage was adjusted - editor), I had doubts about these
seats, but was pleasantly surprised, I didn't have a single problem with
these seats. I was able to see everything, including the yellow brick
road, Toto, and the ruby slippers. If you need to see this show and are
on a budget, row B is definitely the way to go, better to be second row
stalls rather then the back of the upper circle - you feel so engaged in
the show. I would not take row A though; the woman in front of me was
unable to see some things and jumped up a few times (middley annoying).
Also, from these seats, the conductor isn't a main problem, so for
brilliant seats at a cheap price go for row B :)"
Reader Paul, also at "The Wizard Of Oz" (February 2011) contributes,
"B12: For £25. Great price as I’m not too bothered about ruby slippers
or yellow brick roads (you do, however see glimpses of both from here!).
A little too close to take everything in, but giving an excellent way to
see it for those on a budget (or who like to go to the theatre more
often than they should..!) and to see costumes and facial expressions
close up. SPOILER ALERT Had to turn around to see the Witch as she
addressed the citizens of Oz, having been lowered on a wire from the
dome at the top of the theatre and floating somewhere in front of the
Dress Circle SPOILER ENDS, but that was fine."
Another reader adds, again with the low stage in place,
"I was able to purchase row B for £25 on
www.seetickets.com
last month. I had a very good view of the stage and close-ups on
all the actors' faces. I only really seemed to miss seeing the
yellow brick road, and I had to turn around in my seat to see The
Wicked Witch hanging from the ceiling."
as does another,
"Row B: Second row stalls bookable for £25 in advance. Very little is
missed and worth considering as a cheaper option as row behind is top
price! I could just see feet although I am very tall."
Another reader who took a seat further back at the £25 "Day Seat" rate says,
"G: Although this is far right I don't feel I missed too much, only a
couple of times at the most was a cast member hidden from view, by the
side of the stage or the loudspeaker. The stage is very high, I was able
to see Toto fine, and the majority of the time I was able to see at
least part of the ruby slippers.
These seats are NOT for 'first timers' or those worshipping
'front and centre' but the monkey feels that given the problems (missing
air sequences) of other similarly priced seats in the rear stalls, these
two rows are going to give a chance to catch the show's atmosphere and
effects in a
way not possible elsewhere for the price.
That said, other reduced price seats from row D back are also
acceptable - further back the better, the monkey feels. It would take B
and C last (C 5, 6, 32 and 33 being the first of these last resorts) as they do feel 'corner' - again, low numbers
side are preferable
(and have nothing in front in B 1 to 4) and the cheaper seats shade the
next price ones for value, slightly, it feels. Do also note that these
seats suffer from the high stage too - see below for more...
Row B ends also suffer
a clip from the speakers too - and those who dislike loud sound might be
advised to sit further back.
Throughout the stalls, a high stage can be an issue.
Reader Val comments on the situation:
"Booked Row C 24 / 25 at top price. my companion felt unwell having to
look up at the stage. we couldn't see the dancers feet at "Sinatra."
At the interval we told the manager and he upgraded us to stalls row J
14 / 15 where we could everything."
The same applies for “The Wizard of Oz” (April 2011) feels the
monkey, with reader Sarah Louise confirming,
"C26 and 27: I knew from reviews across the web that we would have
problems with the view regarding the Yellow Brick Road and Ruby
slippers, but I was not prepared to not see ANY of it at all!! Not only
did we not see the road or slippers, we did not see the house falling on
the witch or her apparent legs sticking out from under it ! The stage is
sooooooooo high, I honestly think these seats should be bottom price."
Another reader confirms hearing complaints at the same show, about
the same row, from another person.
A localised problem as, at a previous show, a reader says,
"'Sister Act': sat in row C of the centre block in the stalls. An
excellent seat in an excellent show!" and another comments for the same
show, "Row C seats 13 and 14. Being 6'5" I had no problems with the
height of the stage, and my considerably shorter wife found looking up
at the stage helpful as it meant the people in front did not block her
view - she was really happy with where we were sat. These are good seats
if you do not mind not always seeing the actors feet, legroom is OK
(It's never going to be better than that!) and being on the aisle was
great. If you have children with you, I would recommend going further
back or to the circle where the rake is steeper."
One reader notes that row D is close enough to see the facial
expressions but feels that sitting 2 rows back would have been better
as, "the stage is high so it blocks the view a bit and you can't see the
dancers feet when they are towards the back of the stage".
Reader Paul comments for "Sister Act,"
"D 13 to 15: A fabulous view from these seats, but would not recommend
it for children due to the flat rake and high stage. This was
demonstrated by the Americans behind who spent ten minutes after they
sat down pacifying their child who couldn't see, even with a booster.
Legroom adequate but no better."
Reader Rebecca says,
"Sister Act, July 2009 row D, seats 28 and 29: The view from there was
generally good, but suffered some from the lack of rake in the front
section of the stalls. As I am only 4'11 and unfortunately had tall
people in front of me, I had to require a child booster cushion to get a
good view."
For "The Wizard Of Oz" (February 2011) a reader notes,
"Row D centre: Three rows back from the front. There were several
children around us, and none could see onto the stage - so they missed
the crucial bits of the story when the house landed on the witch. I
could just see the legs sticking out with the magic shoes, but had to
tell my young daughter to stand and look. Later, she didn't see the dog
coming onto the stage or the Yellow Brick Road when it appeared. My
daughter went to the loo in the interval and overheard some people
asking if they could move to the back as they were in the front row, had
sore necks and couldn't see anything. One lady behind us had bought
tickets for her daughter and grandchildren, so they must have spent a
lot for the children not to see everything - which was a shame."
the reader's companion adds,
"None of the people around that front stalls area could see some of the
key things like the witches’ legs under the house; the slippers; the
yellow brick road and at first you couldn’t see the dog very well at
all."
Another reader, also at "The Wizard Of Oz" - after the stage was
altered, in January 2012 says,
"D19: I got my ticket for £35 through the
Get Into London Theatre ticket promotion. I'm
6ft tall and thought I might have trouble with the seat at first glance
but when I sat down there was about an inch between my knees and the
seat in front which I was able to tuck my legs under throughout the
show. This made the seat of average comfort. The seats in row D are not
staggered with those is row C and so the head of the person in front is
directly in the way (person in front of me was about 5ft 8 inches).
There is also very little rake in the first four rows. I did miss the
feet of the actors when they were near the back of the stage and
developed a slight neck ache from looking up but I felt these were
bearable at the ticket price."
In the 'restricted view zone' during the preview period (when the
stage was higher) for the same show, readers David and
Katie say,
"D 3 and 4: My wife, 5' 6" and I, 6' 7" like being close to the front.
We were advised this was a side view with partial loss of sight lines to
the right but didn't mind - we're seeing the show again anyway.
However, as soon as the lights went down and the curtain went up it
became apparent there is a much bigger problem for all stalls Row B, C,
D, E and F, probably G and H too. The stage is sooo high that all the
actors were cut off at the knee. Apparently the show features a yellow
brick road, sparkling ruby slippers and I've heard there is a dog at the
end of the taught lead! We saw none of it. And that honestly includes me
at 6' 7", I couldn't see ANYTHING! I had to raise myself out of my seat
to glimpse the feet of the wicked witch of the east sticking out from
under the house.
Remember, we paid preview prices of £45 each last night and the seats we
were proposing to buy for my mother's 80th would have been £62.50 each
all be it more central in the same row.
Needless to say we ended up buying Royal Circle for June. We popped up
there during the interval and can assure readers it's a different show
altogether from that perspective.
These front stalls seats are really not worth more than £20 a ticket.
The whole evening is spoiled by the severely limited view. DO NOT BE
TEMPTED TO TAKE FRONT STALLS."
In row E, a reader comments:
"We did enjoy the show but even row E, where we sat, was far too close
(for "Sinatra"). We couldn't see the dancers feet and had to crane our
necks when the movable screens were high. I would recommend anyone to
sit dress circle or mid to rear stalls rather than what is normally
regarded as the best seats in near to front stalls."
That isn't generally an issue for other musicals, but the monkey felt it
advice some may find helpful, especially for sequences taking place on
raised areas of the stage.
A reader warns for "The Wizard Of Oz" (February 2011),
"F 8, 9 and 10: I always like to buy front stalls seats to be
near the action, this time it backfired.
I ought to point out that although I'm short at 5ft 4, my husband,
who is 5ft 11 was with me, and he couldn't see the stage floor either.
There were 2 little children (aged about 5 or 6) in row E in front of
me who I felt really sorry for, because they obviously couldn't see very
well at all.
The stage is so high that we
couldn't see the yellow brick road, the actors' feet, (which is pretty
crucial with the red slippers), the Wicked Witch of the West in one
scene and most of Toto because he was so small. It REALLY spoiled the
performance. Very disappointing."
At the same show, in the same seats, reader Mutti adds (on behalf of
her daughter),
"F10 and 11: When I bought the tickets back in May
2010, no mention was made of them being restricted view. So I was
really cross to learn from my daughter how disappointing it was
for them not to be able to see the Ruby Slippers, Toto or the
Yellow Brick Road lighting up, from their seats. They only knew
about the latter from hearing comments from other members of the
audience sitting further back."
Thinking about it, the monkey recalled SPOILER the road raising as it
lit SPOILER ENDS, but on the other two issues it thought they can only
be solved by making Toto a Great Dane and giving Dorothy platform Ruby
Slippers, it guesses.
Reader Avril puts a different view, though, at the same show,
"F 22 to 25: Had a great view with plenty of legroom. Wouldn’t want to
be any further forward though, or the stage is obscured."
At a different show, another says,
"F19: Excellent seat not too close to the stage but close enough to see
facial expressions. Also great leg room."
The centre block offers clear views of the stage. Row J seats 16 to 31
are rated the best seats in the house by theatremonkey. At top price
pick rows J then K - which is slightly higher than J, the monkey notes - or I; then L, M , H, G, N or O, F or P then E
depending on whether you are keener on seeing the whole stage, or being
generally closer to the action.
For “The Wizard of Oz” (April 2011) central seats in rows J and K are "premium"
priced. Your call, feels
the monkey, who would rate them just "fair" at the price - and
is sad that its beloved row J centre is at this high price... even if
they are some of the very best seats in the house. It would save cash
and sit further back, it if were honest.
Reader K Favelle says,
"Had row G seats in the stalls, fairly central within the central block.
I think we were 21 to 23 but I might be one out either way. We really
enjoyed the show from these seats as we felt close enough to the stage
to really be able to see the actors' expressions clearly but not so
close that we had to strain our necks back or lose a wider view of the
whole stage.
Legroom felt fine (though none of us was taller than 5 foot 6 inches)
though I suspect it would have been tight for my very tall husband had
he been with us."
Reader Georgie Harris comments,
"we sat in the stalls Row G seats 25 to 28 which were perfect"
Reader Mandi agrees,
"Myself, my mum and my 6 year old son had seats Stalls G26-28. These
seats were great as we had a perfect view of the stage"
Reader Mila echoes this,
"Our seats in row G of the stalls (thanks to Theatremonkey and dogged
persistence at the box office) were excellent, a perfect view."
Reader Rupi adds, for "Sister Act" (June 2009)
"Row G 20 and 21 - fantastic seats! Close to the action whilst still
being able to see the whole stage."
Reader Yvonne Coombes
reports:
"Myself, my husband and daughter (4 and a half) sat in stalls seats G11
to13 and these were fantastic. Great views throughout and close enough
to really see the expressions on the faces of the cast members. We got a
booster cushion for my daughter. I would recommend these seats and those
immediately round them to anyone."
Behind them, just a bit along, another reader says for "Sister Act" (May
2009),
"H11: secured this ticket for £35 on an offer. Legroom was decent, and
the view was very clear – however bear in mind that the Palladium has a
very wide stage in comparison to other London theatres – so if you’re
paying full price, then the middle section of the stalls is definitely
preferable."
Another reader comments, for "Sister Act" (June 2009),
"Row H was great for the view if a little tight in the leg space."
Further to the sides is another story...
Reader Julie warns that, "Myself and 2 children were in stalls seats
H40-H42. While we enjoyed a lot of the show, our view was very
restricted - apart from H40, we could not see the rear of the stage at
all, and missed some of the plot. Very disappointing".
Behind them, in J, reader Edward records,
"J1 and J2 afforded very good views of the stage, but we couldn't see
the right side and hence missed the whole of the part where the children
bid goodnight to the party and ascend the stairs."
In row I for "The Wizard Of Oz" (February 2011) before the
stage was lowered, a reader says,
"I 11 to 14: I’ve been to the London Palladium many times - have they
raised the stage even more for this show (perhaps that’s why row A has
gone)? I’m 5ft 10 and the front edge of the stage was at eye level. As
the stage isn’t heavily raked I couldn’t see the stage floor from this
position (when flat) so anyone shorter risks losing actors feet (and
those red shoes – although my 10 year old on a booster cushion says she
could see them so perhaps not)!"
I could see people’s feet, but just literally couldn’t see the stage
floor and felt I shouldn’t really be expecting to look up at the cast in
quite the way I was in this row – so a comment for the really picky to
watch out for perhaps - because otherwise very good position to the
stage (at the risk of repeating myself) – I’m certainly not complaining
though, we didn’t pay full price as it was...
So, a good position in relation to the stage - so agree
with 'fair value' rating for where we were; but for this row in the
centre block I would say perhaps should only have a “white” rating and
not “green” - same of course for G and H, so perhaps only rows L to O as
“green”.
If I were to guess and from my recollections of sitting there for
Chitty I would say that the best seats for me for this show would be the
first few rows in centre block of the Dress Circle. Although further
back than our row I you will see everything really well. However, I
don’t know the pricing up there so maybe these are now “premium?
(mostly, editor).
Also, even from row I you sure can feel the heat off the flares and
even off those bright stage lights on the side of the stage that they
blind you with (I’m sure they’ll have a technical name)! ALW’s team must
have got a taste for the flares at “Over The Rainbow”. We managed to get
tickets to one of the early rounds and Graham Norton warned those
sitting right in front of the flares they might get a little warm – no
kidding!"
Reader Danni C, in the same row for the same show, reports,
"I 27: Right in the centre. I saw on theatremonkey's seating plan that
from the front row to row I, some people said they couldn't see
Dorothy's red shoes or Toto the dog. In Row I, I could just about see
her shoes and I saw the dog perfectly. Any further forward and I
wouldn't have seen either. In fact, another person told me that in the
third row they could hardly see anything as the stage is VERY high for
this production."
The monkey has adjusted things accordingly. Another reader on a later
visit to see the Wizard, says,
"I was in row I and there is a very obvious slope of the stage allowing
sight of feet etc, not sure if that is any different from before but we
had seats from row C back to J and no one made any comment about not
being able to see feet etc. Everyone loved the show."
Another "Wizard Of Oz" goer in June 2011 also seems to confirm things
have improved,
"I16 and 17, the right hand aisle seats in the centre block. The view
was excellent, no doubt helped in that nobody was sitting in front of
us, and legroom was good. No problem in seeing the yellow brick road,
Dorothy’s red shoes or Toto the dog."
Looks like some changes have been made, thinks the monkey.
In the same row, for a different show, reader Nigel Williams says,
"We sat in I27 and I28 which is approx 8 rows from the stage and one
seat in from the aisle. They were superb and as I looked around I
honestly couldn't see any seats I'd much rather be sat in."
For "The Wizard Of Oz" again (February 2011) things are resolved
further back, as a reader says,
"K 25 and 26: I must say these seats where fantastic! None of the stage
was obstructed (the Red slippers where visible and the yellow brick road
was clearly visible) also with plenty of room. SPOILER ALERT Only
problem there is a possibility of jarking your neck when the witch
appears from the rafters (but that's all part of the fun of the show.)
SPOILER ENDS."
Reader Caryl says for "The Sound of Music,"
"We had perfect viewing seats in the stalls L16, 17 and 18."
Reader Tamara comments:
"Sat stalls row L seats 20 and 21, perfect for me, centre stage, not too
far forward or too far back. Just right to feel part of the action and
see the actors faces, without having to crane the neck".
In row L for "The Wizard of Oz," (March 2011) a reader says,
"My group were in rows L, M and N and from row L my sight line just saw
the floor of the stage. I am 6'1" so I suspect anyone sitting much
closer than that would have increasingly restricted views of some of the
action the closer to the stage they are.
I would say that our rows were just about perfect for this show.
SPOILER ALERT The wicked witch hung in front of the dress circle (almost
above our heads) so all in the DC would have a superb view of her, but
anyone in rear stalls would only see her feet at best - until she flew
on to the stage. The upper circle would not see her hanging except that
she did descend from the roof so passed in front of them first." SPOILER
ENDS.
Reader Steph Nicholls says, of discounted seats for "Sister Act" (May
2009),
"Got M40 to 46 for £37 each from the ticket booth in Leicester Square
underground. I had a good view from M40, others at the far end (M45/46 -
coloured red by Theatremonkey) were happy with the view though commented
that occasionally the walkway towards the back of the stage was obscured
by scenery in front."
In that same area, for the same show, another reader reports,
"If only my lovely relative had seen this site before spending A LOT of
money on tickets. Seat M41 in the stalls was one of the worst I've ever
experienced in a theatre. My own relative was sat in front of me and at
6ft is not extraordinarily tall. I (at 5ft 8) could not see the centre
of the stage for any of the show because his head entirely blocked it -
which meant missing a great deal. Also, a very strong cold breeze blew
at the block from M39 to M45 - we were all putting our scarves back on!
Wonder if it came from the exit that was at the back or an air con unit?
Such a shame."
From row N at "Wizard Of Oz" (February 2011) reader Suh opines,
"N15: The Palladium has very few stalls seats without a good view
- unless Horse from 'Bonanza' is in front of you. I was very happy in
row N, though I always try for row E in any theatre."
The Palladium is a vast theatre and sitting far back yields
only average value for money if seats are top price past around row P. In this case, being
nearer the front gets the monkey value for money vote.
Reader Joss comments for "Sister Act,"
"Row P 16 to 21 and Q16 to 20: On the aisle. The seats were small but
comfy, and there was more legroom than most (but not great if you have
long legs). None of our group had cause to complain. The view was great,
you could see the whole stage, nothing was missed and the overhang of
the balcony above does not obstruct the view of this show at all."
Reader Tim Powell observes:
"Seats 32/33 in Row P in the Stalls which gave a perfectly good view
(but I would probably be aggrieved at having to pay the same top price
as the front rows if we weren't on a half price discount)."
A point well made, felt the monkey.
Also in row P, at “The Wizard of Oz” (April 2011), another reader
observes,
"P9. View good, but sitting below the circle. Above this overhang a
ventilation panel is fitted, blowing strong cold air. A number of us
both in row P, and in rows immediately behind and in front requested at
the interval that the air conditioning was turned down. No action was
taken."
For “The Wizard of Oz” (April 2011) row Q is top price - skip it,
you'll miss a bit yet pay full rate. Behind that, rows R to T are more
reasonably priced than usual. Be aware that you may miss the top of the
set from these - particularly row S. A little action takes place there,
but not plot spoiling - but for the price, the monkey would certainly
take central row Q and take a chance if saving cash is the object.
Otherwise, for this show, paying a little more to sit forward of the
overhang will honestly provide a slightly richer experience, it feels.
Row T, for the same price, again the monkey would skip - row U has a
similar view for less cash.
As a reader at "The Wizard Of Oz" says,
"Q32 and 33: (Took my) 5 year old daughter. Get there early to get a
booster seat as you'll definitely need them. Our seats were fine. You
have the benefit of being on the end of a row and you are in the centre
block and can see all the stage. The only downside was they were a
couple of rows too far back to get the full effect of SPOILER ALERT the
flying witch END OF SPOILER. We could see if we ducked down a bit, but
it wasn't ideal."
Another reader notes perfect
sightlines from central row R at another show, though one adds,
"We were seated right in the middle of row R in the stalls and found the
view to be very good, apart from at the end where the escapees on the
mountain were lost for a few seconds as the mountain turned. Leg room
was excellent."
Reader James F. says, for 'Sister Act' (May 2009),
"I sat in the Stalls R7 and 8 and the Dress Circle obstructs the view of
the top right hand corner of the stage and because of the angle to the
stage some of Stage Left, but you don’t miss a single thing! The leg
room is OK, but not great, but unless you get a really tall person (or
someone wearing a habit that they brought from the merchandise stand),
your view should be unobstructed."
Regular theatremonkey seat reporting reader Mark comments,
"Row S for 'Sister Act' (September 2009): Good clear view but felt quite
distant. The other two times I was in Row A stalls and I honestly don't
think there is anywhere better to sit for this show than right at the
front."
Rows U to W are again cheaper, with row U another monkey
possible as it mentions above - cheaper than T, same view. Again, don’t expect to see anything happening at high level,
but worth a try if the Upper Circle is too high and too tight on
legroom. Probably not one for younger children, though, or anybody who
wishes to see the show in its entirety. From here there really are about
5 minutes of the show and some neat effects that are only going to be
heard, not seen. Please bear this in mind when booking any seat from row
T back.
In row T, reader Lisa says, for "The Wizard Of Oz" (April 2011),
"T 26 and 27: Limited view - however I could see all the stage and we
only missed two very small sections of the show, but this didn't spoil
anything for us. I did feel a little bit far away at times, but not too
much. Overall thought view was fantastic, especially for the cheaper
price.
At a previous show, reader Paul Jones says,
"We were in the Stalls in row T and seats 15/16/17/18 on the end of the
central block. As these were the second tier prices (for "The Sound Of
Music" in 2006), although the operator discounted them even further...
they were excellent value. With a 5 and 7 year old in tow we were not
sure how it would go, as they like to be closer to the action, but no
grumbles and with the eye glasses in use, albeit sparingly, they did not
move much, the kissing scenes being the exception! We got there early to
get the booster seats; but the rake is quite good at Row T... The sound
was fine where we were and, as someone noted, you cannot see the top of
the stage quite - but this does not matter as all scenery is below it a
little, so we did not miss anything."
Reader Cristopher H, further along, says,
"Our seats were T 33 to 35 and they were absolutely wonderful (cheaper
for "The Sound Of Music" in 2006)as the rake is very noticeable."
Reader Jackie agrees,
"Row T was very good (cheaper for "The Sound Of Music" in 2006) and
given the rake we had a very good view – leg room was less desirable
though."
Reader Gill Gill says of their group visit to "Sister Act" (May 2009),
"Rows O to T 28 to 40 side stalls. No problems mentioned at all
regarding the seats, the view was good and audio perfect."
Another reader comments,
"T5 Great seat - when got for £25 for "The Sound of Music" (February
2009). No complaints but would have liked to be maybe a little bit
further forward."
From row V, aside from seats around the sound desk, the value is just
fair. If legroom is an issue, pay more to take seats in the rest of the
rear stalls, otherwise the view from the Upper Circle make sitting there
a cheaper option well worth thinking about.
Row V 23 to 29 is in front of, and rows W to XX are beside, the sound
desk. This is annoying, so choose W 12 to 20 and W 30 to 45, and X and
XX 1 to 5 and X 15 to 20 and XX 8 to 11 to avoid the worst of the
problem. These seats offer very fair value and theatremonkey prefers
them to the Upper Circle on grounds of legroom, though accepts they are
a tad more expensive. Do remember that for "The Wizard Of Oz" some
sequences are missed, and that the desk will really block views for
those directly next to it.
From row V at "Sister Act" (May 2009) reader Kirsty reports,
"Row V seat 36: Despite being right at the back, the set design wasn't
so big that my view was hampered. I saw the actors, I saw the set and I
felt I paid the right value of money for the seat (£41)."
Another reader says,
"I was in V1 and my knees were wedged in which detracts from enjoyment.
It was too far back to see or hear properly for me."
From row W for "The Wizard Of Oz" (February 2011) a reader reports,
"W: I can say that the Palladium is still one of the most uncomfortable
seats for leg room that I have ever sat in. Last time I was at the
Palladium I was in the Upper Circle, and swore never again, but
unfortunately the stall seats are only marginally more comfortable. The
end seats have the most leg room because of the way it curves, so as it
was pretty empty, we all moved around and got slightly more comfortable
seats. If it had been sold out it would have been a nightmare. The
yellow brick road was seen perfectly although, SLIGHT SPOILER the flying
witches/monkeys SPOILER ENDS could not be seen from so far back in the
stalls. I think the best view would have been the dress circle. It was
not a problem though, they were brief things that were not upsetting to
miss, although if possible they would have been good to see."
The monkey observes the legroom problem may be even more acute up
there, though...
In row X, reader James says that his parents observed,
"Seats 1 and 2... my dad is tall and likes an aisle so he can stretch
his legs. They have informed me that the view was brilliant, they
couldn't make out facial expressions, but and they didn't suffer from
being next to the sound desk."
Reader Kan has made a very interesting discovery, "I saw CCBB in
London Palladium, it was a "full-house" and I was not able to obtain a
ticket. Then I got a standing ticket...
... Once inside I noticed there is a seat which is not recorded on any
seating plan or in their box office computer system seat Z1, just behind
seat XX7.
I was the only one who bought a standing ticket that night, and so I
took Z1 and had a seat during the whole show."
Maybe they will start to sell this ticket if anyone reads this, thinks
the monkey...but until then, it is worth knowing, isn't it?!
Wheelchairs can replace seats L46, O48, Q48 and S49. The view is poor
from all these seats. O 48 is the best of a bad bunch with distance
offsetting the poor viewing angle. Transfer is possible to any aisle
seat. See notes.
In general the usual rule of the jungle applies to the stalls. Insist
on centre block seats as they are the same price as the sides. You are
paying the same money so why settle for an inferior seat.
Legroom is good throughout the stalls, best from row F back to T. Slightly
limited in row A 1 to 3 and 23 to 25, and Z1. F40, N1 and N16 have extra
space for one extra leg, while row B 1, 2, 3, 4, 32 and 33, C 1, 2, D37, I1,
F1 and D 37 have
nothing in front and / or more legroom than usual.
DRESS CIRCLE
Called the ROYAL CIRCLE in this theatre.
The Upper Circle overhangs the Dress Circle at row C. The top of the
stage is not visible from row J back. A reader notes this isn't usually
a problem. Oddly, the opera glasses have gone missing from the
backs of seats in the Dress Circle though - which might be... If anyone
else finds this as irritating as the monkey does, contact us!
The Dress Circle is split into three blocks, centre and two sides by
aisles.
The view from all seats is fine, except that the first and last six
seats in the side blocks from row G back sometimes suffered a bit in the
past from bad set design / lighting positions / overhang.
Seats in the centre block rows A to F particularly offer good views
of the stage. Those in the side blocks in these rows also have little to complain of,
though choose the centre block first.
For “The Wizard Of Oz” (April 2010) some seats are "premium"
priced. Your call, feels the monkey, who would rate them just "fair" at
the price. It would take Stalls for legroom comfort first, though, if
taller; Dress Circle for view if legroom isn't a concern.A reader at
"The Wizard of Oz" (February 2011) comments, "Row B: It was worth paying
the premium price for the effects."
Also at "The Wizard of Oz" (February 2011), reader Mila reports,
"A 23, 24 and 25": Right in the middle, amazing! To see this show, the
Royal Circle is absolutely the best place to sit. People have mentioned
the bad view from the stalls - well, from the Royal Circle you can see
everything, and SPOILER ALERT when the wicked witch flies down from the
rafters, she hovered right in front of us. My kids thought that was
awesome. SPOILER ENDS Definitely sit in the Royal Circle."
At the same show, and a row back, another reader opines,
"B 21 and 22: We could see everything, I think they're some of the
best seats I've ever had. The circle is well raked from row A so the
people in front of us were not in the way at all, and the wall of the
circle is low enough that row A doesn't have to lean forward and
therefore does not obscure anyone else's view.
The stage is incredibly high, so we could see how easy it would be
for people in the stalls not to be able to see what's going on. A lot of
the action takes place quite far back on the stage so I would imagine
that quite a lot would get missed. However the Royal Circle is a perfect
place to sit. The stage doesn't seem far away at all and as we were in
seats 21 and 22 we were dead centre and had an amazing view."
Theatremonkey regular seat connoisseur James says,
"B20 and B21 for “The Sound of Music”… for the view, best seats in the
house!" Reader James from Finchley says of "The Sound of Music,"
"Sat in Dress Circle B27 and 28. The view was excellent. Having
previously sat in row I of the Stalls, I much preferred the Dress Circle
as I could see the whole stage without moving my head from side to side.
The absence of any safety rail at the front also contributes towards a
great view. Having read various comments and seen the whole section “in
red” I was very concerned that I might be very uncomfortable. However, I
am 5’7” and found I had plenty of legroom – I’ve sat in theatres that
are far worse. "
The monkey has since relented and revised things to a "white" average
rating, taking into account view... It still warns all concerned that
there isn't the legroom expected for the price, though. See
further down the page.
From row C, regular contributor James says,
"A group of us sat in seats C15 to C29 for "Sister Act". Everyone said
they had a great view and the sound is excellent here too."
Reader K Fried says,
"Our seats (royal circle, C 31 and 32) were very good and the view was
perfect. Leg room is cramped, but not dire. Just check your bags and
coat and unless you've got unusually long legs, you'll do just fine."
Regular theatremonkey seat commentator James says,
"Had seats C31 to 37 in the Royal Circle for "Sister Act". The view is
great from most seats here although you are getting a little side on as
you get to the higher numbers. Sound is no problem from here. We got the
tickets for a special offer price of £19.50 which was an absolute
bargain!"
Some readers confirm this for "Sinatra" (too February 2006):
"We were in Row D of the dress circle and could see everything."
Reader Tim Powell says of "The Sound of Music":
"We had seats 16-19 in Row D of the Dress Circle which were a little
tight leg-room wise but the view was excellent and at least, being the
tallest, I had an aisle seat to stick my leg down!
Further along, and over the aisle, in the same row for "Sister Act"
(June 2009) reader Hannah reports,
"D 8 to 15: The view from these seats was great, with a steep rake and
pretty good leg room. We only paid £20 for the tickets, as we got them
through a friend, so I don’t know if I would pay the usual £62.50 for
them. But if you have money to burn, they do offer a good view."
Even further over for "The Wizard Of Oz" (February 2011) reader
Graham adds,
"D 38 to 40: Although I thought they might be a little bit too far over
to the left hand side, were actually really good seats with an excellent
view. Legroom was fairly tight for me, being 6', but I managed to wedge
myself in without too much knee ache throughout the evening. I've sat,
and prefer to sit, in the Circle here because I think it offers the best
view of the stage."
Another reader feels:
"row E20 - 24 must have been the best seats in the house perfect view at
all times"
Regular seat connoisseur James says,
"Sat in Royal Circle seats E20 and E21 for "Sister Act" (May 2009).
Great view and the sound is good from here too."
Along the row and over the aisle at "The Wizard Of Oz" (February
2011) readers Claire and Daniel opine,
"E 33 and 34: Fantastic seats. They cost me £62.50 per ticket but were
well worth the price. I'd read up before on Theatremonkey about the best
places to sit, and to me the Royal (Dress) Circle was the best bet.
Previous reviews had mentioned people sitting in the Stalls or Upper
Circle missed various parts of the show like the SPOILER ALERT flying
witch and monkey SPOILER ENDS / seeing Toto / seeing Dorothy's Ruby Red
shoes, but you saw everything from our seats. Leg room though is very
tight so that's why I opted for two side seats - so me and my brother
could swap over to stretch our legs in the aisle. Try to get seats in
the Royal (Dress) Circle - you will not be disappointed."
At another production a reader says,
"F20: for "The Sound Of Music" (2007) and it was
a fantastic view. It didn’t seem distant which it can do from the 6th
row of some Dress Circles. A very clear view and excellent sound."
Another reader adds,
"Row F 24 to 27 – almost centre stage so good view of all the action and
adequate leg room."
Further out in row F, a reader says, for "Sister Act" (May 2009),
"F10 and F11: Sightlines were perfect, we saw everything and felt very
close to the action. Legroom was not as bad as I thought it would be (I
am 5 ft 11). There was no one in F9 which meant we had some extra space
which also made the difference."
It would, notes the monkey... hope for the same luck if you sit there
and are taller...
Rows G to J offer only moderate value if sold at top price, since they
are a long way from the stage for the money. Rows K and L at top price
have the same fault - but L has an inch of extra legroom...
Another reader in row F for "The Wizard Of Oz" (February 2011) felt,
"F48: I would have liked to have been more central (late booking) but
nothing was missed on the stage, I probably wouldn't want to be any
further back though. Leg Room was tight and it was warm up there. The
stage is quite high so I would advise readers to sit from Row E in the
stalls back and the Royal Circle Row A to F to be able to take all the
scenery in."
Reader LJF felt the seats in row G had a fine view, but were expensive
through the agency they bought them from.
Theatremonkey regular seat connoisseur James comments,
"G23 and 24. Even seven rows back here, the view was still great
although I did get discounted tickets. Perhaps at full price it is a
little too far away."
A reader says,
"I did feel a little distant from the stage (in row J) and think the
Upper Circle rows C to G (in the centre block of course) may well give a
similar view, and £20 saving on top price."
A reader reports,
"We sat in the Dress Circle (I 48 and 49) for a production and
unfortunately, the view of the stage and a small amount of the action
was slightly obscured due to the angle, and it must have been worse for
people in seats 50+"
Though this isn't always, monkey advice is still be careful in the back
rows at the ends of this wide Circle.
For "The Wizard Of Oz" (March 2011), theatremonkey regular seat
commentator James comments,
"K10 and 11:. A little far away at full price, but no problems with the
sound or the sightlines from here."
BIG BUT IN ALL SEATS. Legroom may well prove a real problem
for anyone over 5ft 5 tall who will be seated for more than 30 minutes or so -
though one 5ft 8 person reported no real issue. Row A is worst, row L has an
inch or so more space, but theatremonkey would not willingly sit here even if
given free tickets (though many readers would!.) New seating has improved things
to this state, which is better than it was, upgrading the circle to "white,"...
but...! Inner aisle seats at the ends of rows B, D, F, H, J and L have a little
more space for one leg to stretch into, while seats two seats off the outermost
aisles in rows B to D seem to have a tiny bit less. If below five foot five
tall, try the circle; all others use the stalls.
Reader Gordon says,
"We had seats B37, 38 and 39 in the Royal Circle - there was very little
legroom between the rows of seats."
Another reader adds,
"We were in row C of the Royal Circle. Super unrestricted view but as
has been said so many times about The Palladium 'don't go in the Royal
Circle if you have long legs'. I'm 6' 2" and not only was there a
mountain on stage I had one sitting next to me. About 20 stone covered
in a pink pullover. His legs were so fat he couldn't put them together
so mine were wedged against the seat in front and with the elevation of
the circle it meant the sharp edge of the top of the seat was wedged
against the bone just below my knee. It is still painful to the touch
now 2 days later."
Another comments that F48 was tight.
By contrast another reader reports,
"Our seats were in the Dress Circle Row H numbers 25 to 28 and have to
say there seemed to be plenty of leg-room even for my husband who is 6
feet tall - however the bloke behind me seemed to find it hard not to
keep kicking my seat especially during Do-Re-Mi which rather had me on
edge for that number - a few choice stares seemed to make him realise he
wasn't at home on the sofa able to lounge about regardless."
To which another says,
"F10 and F11: Legroom was not as bad as I thought it would be (I am 5 ft
11). There was no one in F9 which meant we had some extra space which
also made the difference."
Dress Circle Boxes
Boxes B, C, BB and CC are at the sides of the theatre at Dress Circle
level. Boxes E, F, FF and EE are above them at Upper Circle level. All
boxes usually offer a fair, sideways view of the stage with only a
minimal portion of the edges not visible. Sold at third price they offer
average value for money and decent legroom at higher than stalls level.
At top price, they are tending towards expensive, though. Choose front
stalls for the same price first.
One reader writes,
"I was quite impressed by the view even though you can't see the right
hand side of the stage."
Another reader was less keen for "The Sound of Music,"
Avoid Box BB for this show. Totally restricted view. We were in Box CC
which was just okay (slightly restricted view), but the people next to
us in BB had to be moved half way through - couldn't see a thing thanks
to large speakers in the way!!"
For “The Wizard Of Oz” (April 2011), boxes at upper circle level have
speakers very close, and even those at dress circle level may find them
very loud. That said, all boxes again provide a view of 'effects' not
available elsewhere at the price, and might be 'fair value' at a cheaper price
- and as 'day seats' for
those willing to accept noise and sightline restrictions.
UPPER CIRCLE
The Upper Circle overhangs the Dress Circle at row C. It is high above
the ground but is does not feel particularly distant from the stage or
vertigo inducing.
It is split into three blocks, centre and two sides by aisles.
A thick metal bar runs across the front of the circle. Row A and B are
designated restricted view because of it. Row A suffers most, the bar
being directly in your eye line. Rows B to D suffer from it to the
extent of being a mild annoyance neatly bisecting the actors at the
waist. Metal posts at the ends of all rows do not intrude into the view.
Reader Teresa Gustafsson says,
"A34. They warned us about the safety rail but for me (5.4), that wasn’t
a problem at all, I think it all depends on how you sit. We had a
perfect, clear view and the sound was great!"
Reader Jess adds,
"My Grannie and I, both 5ft 7, and also my parents (who are both 6ft),
sat in row A seats 30 and 31, located in the central block of seats in
the upper circle. Thanks to theatremonkey, we had already been warned of
the lack of legroom and the metal rail running horizontally across the
front of the upper circle, but we didn't find either of these a problem.
However right in front of seat 31 there was a shorter vertical metal bar
supporting the rail which was awkward as you had to try and look around
it. I think these metal bars were in front of all the odd numbered seats
in the front row of the central block of the stalls. Overall, very good
seats for the price, although should be avoided by tall people who need
legroom, and also shorter children may find it hard to see."
Reader Katie opines, for "The Wizard Of Oz" (February 2011),
"A14 to 17: Although we had to jiggle a bit to see stage left, the view
was fine. The leg room, however, was appalling; no-one over 5ft 5 need
apply!"
The views from rows E to M is fairly clear in both centre and side
blocks.
Reader Stephen compares row E with the Dress Circle,
"I mentioned that sitting in the middle of row E of the Upper Circle may
be just as good as the middle of row J in the Dress Circle which was
where I was seated last time. At £20 cheaper it is tempting and may just
be worth it - but don't go further back than row F, and certainly don't
bother with rows A to D unless at a last resort.
Row E in the Upper Circle is quite a good view. You are able to avoid
the leaners in row A and those in row B who are trying to look over the
top of the leaners. You are aware of the metal bar at the front of the
Upper Circle , but it appears in your eyeline at the front of the stage
and is just out of the way. However, the leg room is dire, worse than
the Dress Circle and I am only 5ft 8."
It is worth avoiding the first and last six seats in all rows since the
viewing angle is not great due to the curve of the circle and intrusion
of the boxes. One reader went further, saying:
"Sat in Upper Circle Row C 10 and 11 (for "The Sound Of Music" in 2006).
Yes there is a metal rail which cuts the actors in half, but this is
always there. The main grievance is that even from seat 10 you could not
see Stage Left (right hand side of stage as they looked). If C10 / 11
had problems then the poor souls who sat in seat numbers 1 to 9 would
have been far worse. If you go to a theatre and have seat numbers 1-4,
you expect some lack of visibility down one side, but from Seat 10?
Additionally the audience in Row A when the action was at the front of
the stage had to lean forward, which meant that the rows behind also had
to lean forwards as well, a concertina effect."
In the second act, the person sat in C12 who is a bigger lad had no room
to sit, with knees which wouldn't fit into the space provided and ended
up standing at the back. This unfortunate situation at least meant the
person in C10 could move across one seat which was a slightly better
view"
The monkey notes both the view and poor manners of the "leaning"
people...
A row back, reader James F says,
"D 10 and 11... The seats offer a full view of the stage as the railings
appear just below the stage. If I were to sit here again I would chose
the centre block in rows D to F only!"
At the fifth price pick row E first, then D, F, G, H. Choose centre over
side blocks for the usual reason of if all blocks are the same price,
centre is best value, no? Also, decide if the rear stalls are more to
your liking for legroom, and worth the extra bananas.
A reader comments,
"Upper Circle seat F30 the view was very good and unobstructed apart
from the nuns vanishing out of view at the start as they moved towards
the front of the stage and the mountain looking like a UFO! The leg room
however, wasn't good... I am 5'5 and felt very cramped."
At "The Wizard Of Oz" (February 2011) a reader says,
"F34 and 35: offered a great view of the stage albeit from a huge
height!"
Reader Steph Nicholls comments from J12 and J13,
"The Upper Circle should maybe be renamed the ‘incredibly high circle
with no leg room’. My wife (5ft 11) had to wedge her knees into the
space provided and has the bruises to prove it. I’m shorter, but found
there little room to move when I needed a change of position. The view
was generally good, we couldn’t see the nuns when they came in front of
the pit and lost some of the action when it was downstage left."
In the centre of this row for "The Wizard Of Oz" (February 2011) another
reader agrees,
"J30: A fantastic show, but nearly ruined by the lack of leg space. I am
5' 9" and found it incredibly uncomfortable. I can't imagine how anyone
taller, or with longer legs, managed. Shame because the seats themselves
are very comfortable, and it's a lovely old theatre."
In the same row for "The Wizard Of Oz" (February 2011) a reader
comments,
"J34 to 36: We were pleasantly surprised with the view for the price
range, saw everything and felt in the right perspective."
Rows L and M seem very high above the stage and isolated due to an
intruding wall at the back of the circle. The view is OK but the
position does induce vertigo in some non-treetop dwellers. On the other
hand, at a mere £17.50 they are well worth a thought.
A reader agrees about row L,
"L47, 48, 49: Great seats. I'm 6ft 2 and felt very comfortable, much
more so then when I sat in the stalls two weeks previously - with
tickets that were £65 - when I was really cramped. These were only
£17.50 and on the second last row from the back of the upper circle;
and, in my opinion they were a bargain. I could see absolutely
everything and felt very comfortable. Highly recommended."
A reader reports from M,
"We were seated in Row M of the upper circle seats 43 to 46. Provided a
fab view for only £25 and I don't think it would be worth paying an
extra £10 for seats 4 rows in front, especially if those seats were
towards the far sides of the theatre."
Of M41 another reader says,
"So this seat is right at the back but for me was fine, end of row. View
OK. You miss some of the higher stage elements (perhaps the opening
scene) but it doesn't distract too much (you use your imagination!) and
some of the top stairs."
with which another reader agrees,
"M49 and 50. For a back row the seats are well priced for the view which
is excellent. However, legroom is very little as my mum is 5ft 6ish and
even her legs were having trouble. The seats can be quite uncomfortable
unless you fidget. I wouldn't avoid these seats, but not put them first
choice."
as does another, for 'Sister Act' (June 2009),
"M11 and 12 for £17.50 had a clear view but were the last row of the
upper circle."
Reader Taljaard adds for "The Wizard Of Oz" (February 2011) that he
found M7 fine too.
BIG BUT …Legroom here is dire in most seats. Row A is especially bad, too awful to make
it, even at restricted view price, value for money. A quirk of architecture
though means row K 19 to 36 gets a little more than the rest, and a reader noted
side block L is also more generous. No recommendation, but if price is all and the best of a bad
situation must be made, pick these. At second to lowest price, little is
lost.
A reader agrees,
"We were in the Upper Circle, K19 and K20. Excellent view, and just
about enough legroom to accommodate a 5’6” person without undue
discomfort."
Another comments,
"As a six-footer I struggled for leg room in our Upper Circle seats (J
7-8) but the view of the stage was mostly unrestricted, although if you
don’t like heights – and it all became a bit too much for one heavily
pregnant lady in the row in front of us – sit lower down."
Another in row J adds,
"Our enjoyment of "Sister Act" was somewhat marred by the dire seats. We
paid £40 to sit in the upper circle J 42 and 43. I am 5 foot 5 and my
knees were right up against the seat in front. The seats themselves are
comfortable, but the leg room is dire and all the men around us looked
like they were in agony. We had a very tall man in front of us who was
obviously uncomfortable; we could not blame him, but because he kept
moving and fidgeting this blocked our view to the stage a lot of the
time. It also meant that every time he threw himself backwards he
practically was in our laps!! I have been in plenty of upper circles but
have never had such a bad experience before. These seats were worth £20
at the absolute top price and were so uncomfortable my knees were sore.
Every single person around us was complaining about the legroom. It is a
shame because the actual seats are actually very comfortable."
One more feels it dire for those of 5ft 8'' too.
In row L a reader says,
"L47, 48, 49: Great seats. I'm 6ft 2 and felt very comfortable."
Another feels that row M also offered some relief,
"My dad and I are both around 6ft tall and found the legroom to be very
good. Also, sitting here means you can lean forward for a completely
head-free view without disrupting other people."
Not something the monkey had noticed...
Notes
Total 2298 seats.
Air-conditioned auditorium.
Infrared headsets available. Occasional signed and audio described
performances. Dog sitter available. Two adapted toilet in Stalls - one new in
the Val Parnell Bar. Wheelchairs can replace stalls seats L46, O48, Q48 and S49. Access is via a fire exit and is level
Alternatively, a ramp can be placed over the three steps from Argyll Street (the
former box office door) to a reception room, then
the user can be taken down to stalls bar level by stair-lift, then on to their
place in the auditorium. The auditorium
rake is steep, good for the view but chair users should check their brakes.
Specific information from www.seetickets.com
or 0844 412 4648 or e-mail customer.relations@rutheatres.com. A
"venue access guide" from the team who created book "Theatremonkey,
A Guide to London's West End," is available to download in PDF format
by clicking here.Booster cushions for small children can be obtained from ushers. These are
limited, and are available on a first come, first served basis - early arrival
is recommended.
Food: Ice Cream and confectionery available. Also bookable in advance (redeem
voucher on day of performance to collect) is a food container called a "Royal
Box" (nothing to do with sitting in a box in the theatre!) containing a
selection of canapés for consumption in the
bar or at your seat. A half bottle of champagne is also available as an optional
extra with the box too - for those over 18 only, subject to usual licensing
laws. Click here for more
information.
Four bars; The Variety Bar (Stalls); The Val Parnell Bar (Stalls); The
Cinderella Bar (Royal Circle); The Long Bar (Upper Circle).
Eleven Toilets; Stalls 2 gents 3 cubicles (new off the Val Parnell Bar),
2 ladies 30 cubicles (7 new off the Val Parnell Bar, 8 in the other
stalls toilet); Dress Circle 1
gents 2 cubicles, 1 ladies 10 and 4 cubicles respectively; Upper Circle 2 gents
2 cubicles, 1 cubicle respectively, 2 ladies 2 cubicles and 6 cubicles
respectively.
A reader comments on comfort, one hot day in June 2010,
"The theatre, if it had any air con, should have tried putting it on as
everywhere you looked people were melting which does make it
uncomfortable."
|
