NOTE: THE REVIEWS
BELOW REFER TO THE PRODUCTION AT THE ADELPHI THEATRE UNTIL APRIL
2006. Though the production remains similar, sadly, the popular
cheap seats in row AA do not exist at the show's new home, the
Cambridge Theatre.
Please note: Some reviews can contain "spoilers" - please don't read
if this bothers you!
__________________________________________________
Chicago is quite simply THE BEST musical currently playing in
London. I am going next week for my 5th time in two years. When I
saw Denise Van Outen in it she completely blew me away, she can
sing, she can dance... and she has a great personality - just right
for the show!!
I saw Alison Moyet as Mama Morten - another fabulous performance....
Everything about the show screams FUN!!!!!!
I cannot believe the monkey's comments for this show... you
really must see it to believe it - everybody I have introduced it to
has loved it, and most have gone back for at least a second time!!!
Stuart Earle
_____________
I agree with theatremonkey entirely. If it wasn't for the height of
my seat from the stage, I would of fallen asleep
Edward Bernstone
_____________
I agree with Edward Bernstone and Theatremonkey entirely. I mean,
singing about murder! Not a very happy story line is it!
Edward Barber
_____________
Impressious - is a simplest definition. It's nice to play CD with
soundtrack when you are driving at night along the seashore a
thousand miles away from London - you feel "ALLTHATRAZZLEDAZZLEJAZZ".
This musical is a kind of lifelong experience.........
_____________
Saw the show very recently and was very impressed.
Marti Pellow (who has now left the show) was fantastic as were the
rest of the cast, cannot agree with the comments about the show
being dull and boring and not keeping your interest. The interval
was upon us in no time at all
Took Theatremonkey's tip on best seats and booked row AA right at
the front, WOW!! had to duck the high kicks superb seats and £10
cheaper than the row behind and got a rose from Velma.
Steve
___________________
Went to see Chicago last night (7th November 2002)...and still
smiling this morning!
I took my girlfriend and like Steve I went for row AA right at the
front. I can tell you being about six feet from that many fishnets
does things to a man...needless to say my girlfriend was far from
impressed. And when Roxy threw me a rose at the end I think it was
the last straw and she left!!
The performance was ok but I'll remember it for other reasons.
Ben
________________
Saw the show on Saturday 1st Feb 2003. Took the monkey's (and
others) advice and went for row AA. Utterly superb. You feel as if
you are a part of the show - I think that the closer you are to the
"action" the more you enjoy the show!! All performances were spot-on
- couldn't fault any part of it. RECOMMENDED!
Terry Hurley
_______________
Murder... Danger... seduction....Thud...
Thats about as much as I heard before I fell asleep in this simply
disastrous musical. My friend and I went to see Chicago (the touring
production outside London) for her 16th, and felt thoroughly let
down.
We had Nick Cotton playing the lead in ours, and I'm afraid he 'aint
no teen heart throb! the whole play lacked energy and feeling. The
costumes were all black, with a token garment, something which would
have worked in one of Brecht's pieces, or a school play, but not
something which is meant to be as lavish as Chicago.
I mean, it really says something when scantily clad women, and tight
trousered men make for a boring night out!
Danielle
Cardiff. South Wales.
__________________
I direct for an amateur company in North UK. I went to see Chicago
last summer (2002). Sat in the Dress Circle about 3 rows back. The
seats were appalling - very cramped and uncomfortable. The theatre
was stiflingly hot.
The show was good but not, in my opinion, wonderful by any means.
Half the production details were dropped (I know the show - directed
it 2 years previously) and the stage was cut down because of the
static orchestra. Choreography was good. Set was non existent.
Lighting was good - not unusual or exceptional.
I got the general impression that people said the show was excellent
because that was what they were expected to say! I thought it was
done on the cheap.
Decided to leave at the interval, but was persuaded to stay and
managed to get an aisle seat which had a bit more room. Noticed that
there were several empty seats which had previously been filled.
Complained by letter to the theatre - reply said ' Thanks for
comment - shall pass them on..''
What a waste of an evening!!
Stuart
_______________________
For what it's worth - and I appreciate that it's not everyone's cup
of tea - I think Chicago at the Adelphi Theatre is a wonderful
musical. It's gutsy, sexy, catchy and showcases some of our best
dancers with those fabulous Bob Fosse moves.
Occasionally it's marred by a "guest star" who doesn't quite cut the
mustard. But I won't let that put me off. I'm going to see it for a
fifth time this very night (13th May 2003)!
James Gardiner
________________________
Can you say amazing?
I was lucky enough to get tickets for Ruthie Henshall's limited run
as Velma Kelly (summer 2003), and though I'm a fan of hers anyway,
she honestly was fantastic. From seeing the film, I hadn't realised
how much humour there was in it, and feel that vital parts were
missed out (as often is in film adaptations).
Billy Flynn seemed a bit weak, but Amos, Roxie, and Mama dazzled.
The set with the orchestra and one prop - the ever used chair -
worked surprisingly well. Though I'm used to seeing extravagant set
design, the minimalist effect suits the musical to a tee.
I was sitting high up - row K in the Upper Circle, and though I
didn't miss much from that position, I felt as though I was outside
the action, and the actors were all performing to the lower levels,
which is in complete contrast to other shows such as "Saturday Night
Fever" and "Les Mis". Also, the fire exit sign was really bright,
and the curtains leading out of the auditorium were left open.
Chicago is DEFINITELY worth seeing by anyone who is a fan of the
type of music, or who just enjoys good theatre.
Kyrsty Mewett
________________
It was a sweltering hot day and there were problems with the trains,
but we made it to London in plenty of time. It was hot in the foyer
but when the auditorium doors opened, a refreshing cool blast of air
con escaped and I said a prayer of thanks.
We had booked row BB and the leg-room was comfortable. We wondered
where the band was - we could hear them warming up - so we concluded
they were round the back somewhere (as it turned out they were on
stage and that kept the music at the very heart of the action, of
which there was plenty).
It was good being so close to the stage, we had to keep looking from
side to side to keep track of everyone's movements, there was so
much going on. I felt involved with the show. It was brilliant,
tip-top all the way through.
It's hard to single anyone out because they all had a part to play
in the mood and ambience the show created, but Linzi Hateley as Roxy
was terrific - such a talented lady. I want to see it all again -
very soon.
Elaine
___________________
My sister and I went to see Chicago on Monday 22nd September 2003 at
the Adelphi Theatre in London after being told by many that it was a
"must see show".
I have to say that it's the BEST show that I've seen, we sat in Row
AA which suited us fine as we can never see with heads in the way.
Admittedly we did go to see Kevin Richardson play the role of Billy
Flynn and I have to say that he exceeded all expectations, Ruthie,
Frances and Richard were also incredible as well as the dancers,
truly a sensational cast.
I never thought the show would be so entertaining and funny but it
was and we are definitely going to see it again.
Joy
London
____________________
Okay guys first things first...
THE SHOW IS SO MUCH BETTER THAN THE FILM
I have been to see the show three times and each time it was
fantastic, the first time I saw the show I sat in Row G of the
stalls, and this gave a great overall view of the action, on the
next two visits I sat in Row B and it has to be said that with this
show the closer the better!! From the second row of the stalls it
felt like a personal performance, we were that close we could
maintain eye contact with the performers throughout the show, and at
the end got showered with roses!!
Granted that it might not be everybody’s idea of a great musical,
but I think that the smoky minimalist set, tale of sleaze, murder
and showbiz, skimpy costumes, fantastic music and great performing
made for a brilliant two hours. All of the performers were fantastic
especially R. Henshall as Velma and L. Hateley (left September 2003)
as Roxie, and the abundance of females in VERY revealing costumes
certainly raised a few pulses in the audience (as a red blooded male
I have to say some of the women were HOT!!)
Chicago is NOT your average “happy clappy” musical where every word
gets sung, the plot is so far removed from reality that its
unbelievable and the villains always get caught!! The story and
comedy are dark and seductive, the emotions raw and the talent
abundant!! The satire and sarcasm (along with a few of the best
songs,) were totally omitted in the film meaning it was poor in
comparison to this amazing production!!
I highly recommend anyone who wants a great night out, go see
Chicago, its got something for all, be it comedy, music or just
great theatre (along with gorgeous women!!)
You will, like it or not, leave the theatre humming the songs!!
Chicago is sexy, sassy, seductive, sarcastic, theatrical genius.
A really really great show!!
So what are you waiting for….GO SEE IT!!
J. Farley
___________________
I first saw Chicago in August 2003, with Ruthie Henshall as Velma
and Linzi Hateley as Roxie. When I went in I had never heard of
Ruthie Henshall, but by the time the show was over I was her biggest
fan! She was amazing as Velma, and I knew I had to come and see
Chicago again before the end of her run.
I came again in October 2003, this time with Frances Ruffelle as
Roxie, and Kevin Richardson (Backstreet Boys) as Billy Flynn. It was
just as amazing as the first time, and we had much better seats. I
was in row B of the stalls, almost dead centre. It's great to be
near the front because all the action is right in front of you, and
you can see every facial expression and fully appreciate the great
acting.
I saw the film at the cinema when it first came out, and having
never seen the stage show I absolutely loved the movie. But when I
saw it on the stage, I wondered why I had ever thought the film was
that great. The stage version is much better, and has much more
comedy, because Chicago after all, is a satire, and they didn't
really show that side of it in the movie as much as they do in the
stage show.
In conclusion, a fantastic musical! If you only go and see one show
this year, make it Chicago!
And all that jazz!
_____________________
I made a real effort to give my wife an original "extra" Xmas
present this year (2003). So what better than a trip to the West
End, to see Chicago?
Well, what a disappointment, we both like the theatre but we feel
cheated at the expense of the tickets and the complete lack of any
imagination from the props and costume departments. We were both
expecting a show to take our breath away, but sadly the only thing
that was taken away was the 5 hours spent travelling from
Manchester, we could have stayed in Manchester and opted to go to an
amateur dramatics play and had better value for money. Why didn't
we, I hear you say? Easy! The Adelphi Theatre, London, a West End
Musical.
I would not recommend this musical if you are looking for the magic
of theatre and a night to remember for all the right reasons.
David and Michelle Mulvey
Manchester.
______________________
Dark, intriguing and dismal. I loved it! This show is hugely unique,
on a different scale. I have not seen a show like it. An original
score, set and storyline all add up to a brilliant night out!
Simplicity is the key with "Chicago". Never has a musical worked so
well with so little set. And the point is there is no need for set
whatsoever. The lavish and luscious dancing creates an amazing
presence that i have never felt due to dance within a musical.
"Chicago" is also very cleverly written. It doesn't seem like a
complex storyline when you are watching it but on the ride home you
realise how cleverly complex the script and music actually is.
If you are looking for a fun yet satisfying musical night out head
for "Chicago" and experience the 'razzle-dazzle' "Chicago" embodies
like no other production
Ben Wooldridge
_______________
Haven't got a good night's sleep in ages?
Go to Chicago.
Believe me - all the jazz won't keep you up.
Alf
______________
Alf , I can't believe you have such a strong, negative opinion on
this musical considering how brilliant it is! If you are going to
make a comment about probably the most original production in the
West End then please give some evidence too!
Ben Wooldridge
______________
Last week (May 2004) I took my 9 year old daughter and my 7 year old
son to see this. They are both major fans of the film and really
enjoyed the stage version. Marti Pellow was very good and Mama
embarrassed my son beautifully by singing and winking at him!. Great
to be in stalls row AA.
______________
This show is still up there in the all time greats of theatre and my
last minute jaunt to the Adelphi proved that. We got three seats
together in the side stalls on row N (which are red on the
theatremonkey plan but I didnt find them a problem at all) - I think
any further back and you do get a restricted view at certain points
in the show.
Right! onto the show. To my dismay, Eurovision starlet Frances
Ruffelle was not doing her thing on Tuesday night so Cecilia Low
took over the role of Roxy and my god she was good as was her
colleague Tiffany Graves (the woman with the scariest high kicks in
the business!...they go past her head!). My only problem was the two
girls have very different voices and often Tiffany simply blew
Cecilia out of the water. But that aside the cast are still
incredibly strong.
I was pleasantly surprised by Marti Pellow who was smarmy and slick
as Billy and Paul Leonard proving to be a fantastic Amos and not
forgetting a fab Zee Asha as Mama. However the star of the show (as
usual) has to be the wonderful Morgan Crowley as Mary Sunshine...to
all those who saw the film I urge you to see the show as it, thank
god, includes the best songs that were annoyingly cut from the film
and "Mary Sunshine" is how she should be portrayed not by some big
lipped woman who once used to be in "Sybill"!
Band were as usual excellent (make sure you stay for the playout
music at the end ...really rather good fun with the band). as for
the chorus...not one bad apple in this bunch. All gave strong
performances especially from Bob J Harms (yum).
One little tip for you...when you go to the TKTS booth in Leicester
Sq and they say they have no "Chicago" tickets left, ask them to
ring the Adelphi for you - we did this and it worked! Go see it and
enjoy...I intend to go again and again. Its a beautiful show played
by beautiful people (and I mean beautiful).
Chris May
___________________
Chicago is a good night out but by no means incredible. I felt the
two lead women were lacking in the voice/singing department somewhat
- especially the opening number All That Jazz - it would have been
more impressive if it was belted out a bit more, had a bit more
life. The dancing from the women was quite average I thought - and
from the men, quite good.
I really enjoyed the simplicity of the set and the costumes, which I
thought was excellent BUT didn't really fit with the show. For the
staging and costumes to be that simple yet effective, the calibre of
singing and dancing would have to be much, much higher to sustain
interest. It's a pity because the production has so much potential -
original and witty and if the dancing was much more complex and (as
they say in the show) 'razzle-dazzle' it would have been much more
stunning and enjoyable. As it was, I kept hoping for more and it
wasn't delivered.
I was disappointed because I went expecting something quite 'dark'
and found it wasn't - the show was performed in far too slapstick a
manner, which detracted somewhat from the wit of the show... I loved
Mama Hen and as someone else mentioned, Mr Cellophane was a complete
winner! Roxy as a puppet was brilliant too... And the band were just
brilliant.
Lisa Dempster
_____________________
Chicago is quite possibly the best musical ever! Please go and see
it because it is so funny and with such a brilliant story line. And
the fact that it has NO set makes it that much better! Go see it.
NOW!
Aaron Butterfield
_____________________
My friend and I were at the 3rd June 2004 performance and loved
every minute - we have seen it many times and thought it was the
best yet. The cast were very professional, they looked great, acted
well and sang with feeling. The leads worked very well together.
(Marti Pellow, Cecilia Low and Tiffany Graves) (all sadly no longer
in the show - Editor). They played up the comedy in the show, giving
it a different edge to previous performances.
Marti looked fantastic, sang brilliantly and held the long note for
what seemed like forever. I think he has perfected his American
accent and hope he is a huge hit on Broadway. He deserves it. Superb
show!!!!
____________________
"Chicago" (July 2004) may have been spoiled for us by the film I
guess. We certainly didn't find it as good as the film, and chatting
to some people sitting next to us afterwards, it seemed a common
theme.
Terrible mis-casting with Big Mama Thornton - I'm sorry, but I
wanted a big mama like Queen Latifah in the movie. You expect a big,
strong, possibly 'mannish' (I'm being polite here) woman in that
role - not a feminine-looking woman wearing a suit. And she had no
ooooomph. Her version of the Latifah song (can't remember the title,
but the one "you be nice to Mama and Mama'll be nice to you" thing)
was totally unforgettable.
And don't even get me started on Haselhoff! Oh my god - stiff as a
board. I'm sure he still had the hanger in his suit. Although he
carried a tune, he looked totally uncomfortable at any sign of
dancing and shuffled around in a very self-conscious manner. And -
where was the TAP DANCE??? How could they miss that whole scene out?
The sad thing was that there were some excellent bits in the show,
but they were unfortunately interspersed with mis-casting and
dullness! However - the orchestra was brilliant! I was surprised to
see them on the stage like that, and actually taking part in the
show itself - as I hadn't read anything in people's reviews on this
site mentioning it? Have they always been on stage like that? They
were great and seemed to get bigger cheers than any of the actors!!
There - that's my review!! Having said all that - the seats had an
excellent view, and my knees weren't scraped too badly despite being
in row B of the Dress Circle!
__________________
My partner and I went to see this fantastic show on Friday 3rd
September 2004 at 5.00pm. This was about the 7th or 8th time I had
seen the show but it was my partner's first time and also his first
West End show. Neither of us were disappointed. Then seats we had,
on the front row, were excellent and theatremonkey was right - you
did feel that you were in the show itself you were so close.
The performances were excellent and also Mr Hasselhoff gave a much
better performance than I expected I must admit. The dancing and the
comic elements are all still there and it is still a super show.
Needless to say it has given my partner, a new theatregoer, the bug
and he wants to see more.
I do have to say that the show far and away surpasses the movie
version being a lot more "in your face" as it were. My partner was
chuffed to bits when Velma Kelly threw him a rose from her bouquet
at the end of the show, it was just a shame that the miserable
gentleman sitting next to him pinched it when it dropped to the
floor!!!
All in all we had a marvelous time and would recommend this
excellent show to anyone.
Messrs Colin and Asa McCarthy-Burton
______________________
My mum and dad took me to see Chicago for my 17th Birthday! I'm a
Big Big fan of the DVD Chicago with Renee Zellweger and Catherine
Zeta Jones! So when I knew I was going I was well happy!
I saw it on the 30th October 2004 with Jennifer Ellison as Roxy Hart
and Kay Murphy as Velma Kelly, Jonn Barrowman as Billy Flinn, Paul
Baker as Amos and Sharon D Clarke as Matron Mama Morton. All I can
say without going on forever that it was Fantastic.
It was a Brilliant night out. The acting and dancing from all cast
was Superb! Ellison played a really good Roxy and Murphy was great
too! The whole cast had voices to die for, Especially Sharon D
Clarke! The men dances were pretty ;-) too!
I Recommend anyone looking for a Sassy, Sensual good time musical,
Chicago is the one for you! I even got a rose thrown by Ellison at
the end which made a good end to my birthday!
Christina
Kent, England.
_______________
I saw the matinee of Chicago on 1st January 2005, What a good way to
start the New Year!!
I had followed the advice of theatremonkey and bought AA seats
14-16. It definitely felt like we were in the show and my husband
received a rose from Velma (made his day!!). Steep angle of viewing
but for £10 less than the row behind it was well worth it!
I saw the film for the first time two weeks ago and was worried
about how enjoyable the stage show would be. Didn't need to be - it
was brilliant! Thanks for your advice on seating.
Chris
______________
Saw the 15th February 2005 production. A great, fun night out.
Anna-Jane Case is outstanding, worth the ticket money on her own and
does put all others a little in the shade. That said, Gill Halfpenny
was fine as Roxy (when she was dancing alongside Anna-Jane it was
though very clear who the pro' is) and Michael French makes a very
fly Billy Flynn. Peter Baker was sufficiently “whimpish” as Amos.
Donna Hazelton is very comic and has great lungs – she was a hit.
The ensemble were clearly having fun and this came across well to
the audience, even if the girls are there mostly for their looks
(and very much appreciated too) and the guys are there for their
pecs’ and butts!
The true stars of the show are surely the orchestra. How refreshing
it is being able to actually see west-end musicians plying their
trade so enthusiastically.
Seats, (Row A 9 to 12), were too low down – a lot of neck craning.
Would recommend from Row J and back. All round, well worth the
ticket price.
Gerry
_______________
Jill Halfpenny Rocks as Roxie Hart! I went just to see her
performance and was not disappointed. She is a rising star. The
entire cast was superb. Anna-Jane Casey has a tremendous voice and
Michael French is just scrumptious to look at.
As an American I thought they all did an excellent job with the
American accents even though some of the women sounded more like
they were from New York instead of Chicago.
Alexis.
American living in Germany.
Performance: February 19th, 2005.
________________
Went to see Chicago last night (25th February 2005) and that it was
absolutely fantastic. A real feel-good show.
Jill Halfpenny as Roxie was superb and what she lacked in technical
ability she made up for in sensuality and emotional expression.
Casey was spectacular with an amazing voice, and well what can I say
say about the dancers - the male dancers are simply yummy and I'm
sure my brother-in-law thought the same thing of the girls.
Absolutely everybody in the cast and orchestra looked as if they
were thoroughly enjoying themselves which was totally infectious!
Mo.
London.
_________________
What a wonderful wonderful show.
I took theatremonkey's advice and booked seats AA15 and 16 and you
felt like you were in the show.
Both my friend and I thought that Michael French was sensational as
Billy Flynn. Both his accent and signing voice were perfect. Jill
Halfpenny was also very good - no trace at all of that Geordie
accent and both her singing and dancing were excellent.
Amongst the highlights of the show were Mr Cellophane and the
wonderful puppet routine between Michael French and Jill Halfpenny -
superb. I think Donna Hazelton's voice was very good, but she just
needs to open it up a bit.
A must to go and see, I think better than the film.
Chris Bennett
Performance seen: Friday 25th February 2005
__________________
We saw the matinee of Chicago on Saturday 12 March 2005. With
Theatre Monkey's guidance, we booked row AA seats 15 and 16 and have
never had better seats! You feel as though the performance is in
your front room and whilst you do have to tilt your neck back to
see, it was not a hardship at all, and there was also stacks of leg
room. Being so close meant you were really able to see all the
expression that the actors and actresses put into their parts. It
did however mean that you got a real "knicker-line" view which was
O.K. for us but the elderly couple next to us weren't quite sure
about it!!
Jill Halfpenny was surprisingly very good, as was Michael French and
for me, the highlights were "All that Jazz" and "Both went for the
gun".
It was a fantastic show, the cast and orchestra were superb and the
seats were awesome - thanks Theatre Monkey
Mandi
____________________
Saw it on Saturday matinee March 19th 2005.
Booked it specifically to see Jill Halfpenny on the strength of her
Strictly Come Dancing win and we weren't disappointed. She was
simply awesome .... to go from a soap star to a West End lead is not
something many could do ....... we were hugely impressed, she is a
big star. Also loved Michael French, he was born to play Billy
Flynn.
The good thing about the show is that they all seem to enjoy
themselves so much, including the orchestra, which makes for a fun
day out for us all . We could have quite happily sat through it
again that night.
On Theatremonkey's recommendation we booked the stalls, row G, and
the view was superb. Not too close to crane your neck but close
enough to feel part of it.
_________________
Saturday 2nd April 2005
Just returned and had to put down (the show) a few comments. I was
utterly disappointed with Chicago, having been given a pair of
tickets as
Christmas presents. The build up to tonight's show was eagerly
awaited.
The seats, Dress Circle (D19 & D20) were good and comfortable for
each half. I have had much, much worse seating in other theatres.
Where is the scenery, there is none, just plain, bare walls and
floors in black. The only props used are chairs in a nice black
shade.
The orchestra pit is located centre stage painted black and members
wear black. The players costumes are black. There is no colour on
stage just the odd highlight of colour from spotlights in the second
half.
The audience were quite kind to the performers and warmed to the
show. Why??, I can only think there were all visitors and could only
go to one or two shows in London.
I took a few cat naps after 1 hour as I lost the plot. I was quite
prepared to leave at the interval and go and have a drink in the
many pubs and clubs in the Strand.
I cannot recommend this show and I can only think as others have
said that it has been done on the cheap. Each ticket was priced at
£42.50 and the ticket hot line phone number has been replaced with
an 0870 premium number, but they do not mention that anywhere. My
friend with me also felt disappointed with the show.
Paul
_________________
I went to see the matinee performance of Chicago on 9th April 2005
for my 21st Birthday.
First of all, I was so pleased that Jill Halfpenny was still in the
cast, as she was the main reason I wanted to see it.
Jill is absolutely amazing. Her accent, singing and dancing were all
spot on and I was so impressed by her. She has true talent and she
will go far.
I was hooked throughout the whole show and I couldn't find one fault
with anything in the show. I easily would have sat and watched it
all over again.
I agree with another reviewer, the puppeteer act between Jill and
Simon Breen, who was excellent as Billy Flynn, was amazing.
I would recommend it!
Louisa
_____________________
I went along with two friends to see Chicago on 8 April 2005. Jill
Halfpenny was still playing Roxy and she was excellent, as was the
rest of this highly professional cast.
As always, I checked with the monkey to find out about the best
seats. On several reviewers' recommendations, I chose AA 21, 22 and
23. When we first sat down, I was apprehensive as I had never been
that close to the stage. As soon as it started though all my fears
evaporated - the cast looks directly at you because they can't see
beyond the front rows. We could even see the finer details of their
make-up and yes, gratuitous views of a more intimate nature. I also
managed to catch a rose at the end of the performance. Good value
seats (£30), if you want to be in the thick of things and get the
entire experience of the show.
Lastminute.com had seats available for £25 but you can't choose your
seat, so I thought the extra £5 was worth it to be able to have some
influence over where I was seated.
This must be the most energetic performance in the West End - bravo
to the entire cast.
Che
______________________
I went to see "Chicago" for my birthday present with the rest of my
family and overall I was not disappointed.
I was apprehensive of how Michael French would make the transition
from screen to stage but my fears were laid to rest after the first
few bars 'All I Care About is Love'. His accent was consistent and
well projected and he suited the role brilliantly.
Roxie Hart was played by a very competent actress whose name escapes
me! Her solo in 'Roxie' was brilliant and her voice was loud and
powerful. She captured Roxies' cheeky character perfectly.
The downside of the performance was Anna Montanaro as Velma Kelly.
Her American accent was AWFUL - a mix of American and German which
resulted in an almost unlistenable drone. Her voice was weak and she
really didn't do any of the big numbers any justice - 'All that
Jazz' would have fallen flat on its face if it weren't for the
excellent chorus. Her dancing was good but the vocal really let her
down.
Andy B
Saw it on 21st April 2005
____________________
If you really don't like 20's style jazz and big bands give this one
a miss but if like me you love anything to do with the 20's and big
bands in particular then this is the show for you.
Where else will you have a full big band on stage performing with
not just 2 or 3 singers but a whole chorus line of excellent singers
and dancers? Many wonder if it will spoil their enjoyment of the
stage show if they have seen the film first. I would say see the
film first then you will understand the plot fully and already start
to really appreciate the wonderful music for when you hear it again.
The stage show is really like bullet lines of the plot as shown in
the film and could be a little difficult to follow especially as the
band almost fills the stage. You would not expect scenery at a band
concert so don't expect any here. It didn't concern me as you need a
lot of imagination in following the dramatic plot and the performers
really bring it to life with much humour which is rather surprising
considering the plot.
I have now seen the show twice. Once 2 years ago with 2 coach loads
and April 29th 2005 when I only ran 1 coach. We were all looking
forward to seeing Jill Halfpenny and Michael French and were
disappointed that Jill had left although Brooke Shields made a good
shot at doing Roxie Hart. Michael French had left / jumped / been
pushed / sacked ??? after a dispute with Brooke Shield but Simon
Breen was an excellent Billy Flynn and certainly did not detract
from our enjoyment. I felt Anna Montanaro as Velma Kelly, although a
great dancer, just doesn't have the voice compared to the official
CD or the film.
It is a however a great show with some super songs and catchy
phrases and that Big Band is absolutely superb. I would willingly
pay to go to this show just to see and hear the band.
John E Oliver
____________________
My wife and I went to see Chicago on the 14th May 2005. We had
stalls seats AA 17 and 18 on Theatremonkey's recommendation. What
can I say, they were absolutely fabulous, you really felt part of
the show. I was worried about having to crane my neck but this was
not the case. We were so impressed we have booked a further 3
tickets for August. Brooke Shields did not disappoint us and neither
did the rest of the cast and band members.
Paul,
Worcestershire.
____________________
I have seen Chicago twice - first on the 15th February 2005 and
second on the 25th March 2005. I thought Jill Halfpenny was
brilliant and she absolutely blew me over! She is a true star and I
think she will be around for some time! I am only 12 but she is my
idol and I want to be just like when I'm older and at school
everyone knows I'm obsessed with Chicago... I pray for these dreams
every night so one day people will be commenting on my performance
in Chicago just like Jill Halfpenny! I am trying to go to stage
school next year so fingers crossed. Well done again Jill you made
everyone in England proud, thank you!
_____________________
An absolutely brilliant show. Thoroughly enjoyable, a great night
out. The seats theatremonkey recommended in row AA were possibly the
best in the house. We really felt like we were a part of the show,
the cast would look directly at you. I would recommend the show to
anybody. I would also like to congratulate the cast and orchestra
for a superb performance. I was singing the songs for days after!
_____________________
Thanks to your wonderful advice regarding seats at the Adelphi, we
booked stalls seats AA 19, 20 and 21. This was the very front row
and we had an amazing time. I would agree with a previous reviewer
who said they felt part of the show, and that is certainly the case.
You feel as if the cast are playing just to you, as you obviously
can't see the rest of the audience, who are all behind you!
Brooke Shields was great as Roxie, what she lacked in the singing
department (and she was still very good) she more than made up with
her acting, which was humourous and moving in equal measure. The old
favourites didn't disappoint, but the set is a little less than
adventurous.
The front row seats give you easy access to the bar at the front of
the theatre on the left, which was little used at the interval, and
much more civilised than getting crushed in the main bars. All
round, it was a great seat and a very entertaining show.
____________________
I bought two tickets in row AA (16 and 17) for my dad for Father's
Day and it was definitely money well spent! We saw it whilst Brooke
Shields was still Roxie, and I have to say, for such a big name, she
wasn't actually that terrific, the rest of the cast were absolutely
AMAZING though!
Our seats were prime viewing spots as during some of the songs ("All
That Jazz" and "Razzle Dazzle" in particular) the cast actually look
right at you! It was so cool, even though it was a bit unnerving!!!
You really do get spoiled by the cast as they look at you an awful
lot and you actually feel part of the performance. Unfortunately for
us, during the interval, a very large and noisy group of people came
and took the empty seats around us and did not shut up throughout
the rest of the performance. The other downside was that the cast no
longer looked at us, but rather at the group, which after a
brilliant start makes you feel really disappointed. Tip: tell an
usher that they've 'taken over' and they should be removed.
The only other downside for myself, was that at 5'5, I couldn't see
the floor. It isn't really essential, but I didn't know that Fred
Casely was still "dead" on the floor until somebody picked him up!
My dad, at 6' had no problems at all, but if you don't mind not
seeing up to their calves, then these really are the seats to take!
We didn't get any roses like other people had spoken of who had
these seats, but we came home showered in the "razzle dazzle" which
flew down from the curtains (again, the group were a nuisance here
as well, as the one sat next to me decided to take a piece of razzle
dazzle; a big shiny circle; off of my knee and put it in her
purse!!!)
To sum up - DEFINITELY RECOMMEND AA16-17 AND WOULDN'T TAKE ANYTHING
LESS!! Thanks theatremonkey!
Cassie Chapman-Moore and Ken Moore, Portsmouth
_____________________
Hi, my fiancé and I travelled from Walsall to London just to watch
Chicago on 22nd July 2005. Nothing else to say but FANTASTIC!!
Kathryn Dunn took the part of Roxie and the whole cast was brill
from start to finish, we were entertained throughout the entire
show.
It doesn't matter that the stage was not 'packed' with scenery
because it didn't need it! If you only see one show this year then
go and see Chicago. I intend to see it if it goes on tour round the
country!!
We were in row BB (stalls) and the view was brilliant, I am only 5
foot but had no trouble at all seeing everyone on the stage, whether
they were standing, sitting or lying down! We were also lucky enough
to catch one of the roses thrown out at the end by Velma - it takes
pride of place with my program in my bedroom.
GO SEE THIS SHOW - I PROMISE YOU WILL NOT BE DISAPPOINTED!!!
______________________
I have seen many musicals and currently been to several a few times
in London but this one in my opinion was a dead loss. I have never
been so bored, never looked at my watch so much for the finish...and
Brooks Shields was in it. I found the lack of scenery a complete
washout, the continual night club acts enough to drive me to drink.
I do know lots of people have enjoyed it but for me it was No No NO
Ms Christina Brooks
____________________
Brilliant show - Dress Circle Seats Row F 18 and19 were perfect.
Good view, enough leg room and not too hot in theatre during show.
Highly recommend but leave early for theatre and remember London
traffic...
Ben Grower
Bournemouth
_____________________
Last Thursday (20th October 2005) I went to see Lynda Carter in
Chicago.
This was the 4th time I've seen it over the years but this time
around it seemed to have lost some of it's sparkle. I'm not sure
why, but the leading ladies didn't quite seem to hit the heights of
previous casts.
Nevertheless, it was great to see Wonder Woman!
_____________________
Thoroughly enjoyed the show. Darius Danesh made a wonderful Billy
Flynn - he was very polished and his voice sends shivers down the
spine. He had the moves down to a "t". The actress who played Velma
was great, as was Moma Morton. Sally Ann Triplett as Roxie was ok,
but nothing to write home about. The one actress who I thought
wasn't up to scratch was the girl that played the Hungarian. If she
hadn't been hung first time round, I would have put in an appeal!
One of the six murderesses (blonde, small) was also too quiet - you
didn't really hear her story.
Yes, there's not much set, but in my opinion it didn't need it. I
was totally absorbed by the action on the stage, which after all is
what most people go to see!
Seats 29 and 30 in Row H (stalls) were perfect - didn't have to look
up or down, close enough to see everything. A little off to the
side, but not a restricted view.
Great songs, great atmosphere, friendly theatre and easy to get to.
I thoroughly recommend it.
Nicki
_______________________
A MUST-SEE SHOW - GO ON, YOU DESERVE IT!!!
We went to see the matinee of 'Chicago' this afternoon (31st
December 2005) and thought it was a really fantastic way of spending
our collective Xmas present money!!!
Myself, hubby and two boys (12 and 14) thought that the whole show
was great. We sat in the Dress Circle G 23 to 26 and the view was
fine. As we are all on the short side the lack of leg-room didn't
bother us, but I could see others in our row squirming to get
comfortable at times.
Everybody on the stage was excellent, and that included the band! It
was delightful to see the musicians having so much fun (don't rush
out afterwards, wait for the 'going home music'). Each character in
the show was well portrayed & all the performers worked so hard and
really looked as if they enjoyed themselves.
We can't wait to go again and see the show from downstairs to get a
different perspective on the action!
Sharon
East Sussex
_______________________
I was taken to see "Chicago" on the 26th November 2005 (afternoon
performance) and what a treat it was.
A spectacular show of dark comedy and Jazz, with the set at a
minimum and the Large Jazz band taking centre-stage.
Roxy (Sally Anne Triplett) and Velma were very good, Velma
especially belting out her songs with gusto, while Roxy put me in
mind of Judy Garland with a better voice! Especially in hat and
black jacket.
Amos was played very well by Victor Mcquire. Darius Danesh was the
total surprise of the show, he WAS Billy Flynn all the way through,
and his vocals and acting were fantastic. The highlight for me was
"We Both Went For The Gun" but "Razzle Dazzle" and "All I Care About
Is Love" came very close! I would never believed that this was his
first big acting role.
All in all a highly entertaining show on all levels and one with a
valid point to be made about society
Denise.
Buckinghamshire.
_______________________
I really love this production seen four times in London and once in
New York. In January 2006, Darius Danesh (now left the cast) was the
best Billy Flynn ever. He’s got it all - good looks; great vocals
and a natural on stage! I loved the whole performance and the
leading ladies were fantastic too. It’s great to sit in the front
rows of the stalls – you really feel part of the show and want to
get up there!!
Terrific and Well Done Darius!!!
Angela
Manchester
_______________________
Went to see this show in September 2005 and on Theatremonkey’s
recommendation sat in the very front row. Have never had an
experience like it – felt like we were on the stage with the cast.
It’s worth doing for the sheer fun of it but don’t be surprised if
the songs are directed at you. Talk about seeing the whites of their
eyes! Very good night out.
Signed "Lizzie loves the theatre"
_______________________
Went to see Chicago on 11th March 2006. Great seats in Row AA of the
stalls, seats 14,15 and 16, nearly central, could not ask for better
seats!
The show was amazing, it really does put other shows to shame! Linzi
Hateley who plays Roxie was brilliant, as were all the cast
Some people think that the orchestra were fun, and really enjoying
it, but they just looked like they were doing what they were told in
my opinion, bit false, but hey, we don't go to look at them, just to
listen!
We were even lucky enough to catch a rose from Thelma and Roxie at
the end, as we were so near the front! And yes, you do feel like
they are singing just to you at times, as they are not shy in
holding a stare, which can be intimidating, but we loved it!
My 12 year old daughter even went up to the stage at the end to pick
up the sparkly bits, to go with her rose!
A fab night, can't wait to go again, well worth every penny, you
won't come away disappointed!
Karen Elliott,
Herts
________________________
Am I the only person who did not enjoy this show? -in all the
musicals I have seen this bored me the most and was glad when it
ended although there were one or two good spots all in all not for
me!!
Ms Christina Brooks N6
________________________
Went to see "Chicago" at the Cambridge Theatre last night, and
definitely have to disagree with the negative comments on your site!
The musical numbers were very energetic and enthusiastic. I quite
liked the stripped down set, as it gave the impression of being in a
sleazy nightclub. We were in row A seats 5 and 6 and had a great
view, only missing the teeniest portion of the bottom of the stage.
The main niggle I had with the play was the casting of Bonnie
Langford. She's a great performer but just seems far too old for the
role. It's a bit like watching your drunken auntie trying to act
sexy! Also I think the sound went during one of the songs, as even
in the second row I could hardly make out the lyrics. But that could
be the fault of the performer who played Billy Flynn, who looked a
little jaded at times.
The funniest part of the evening was on leaving the theatre, we were
pretty much the last people to leave and overheard one of the bored
looking ushers singing "All that crap" to himself!
Natalie
___________________
This musical absolutely amazed me. I saw it last night, 26th July
2006, with Jennifer Ellison as Roxie, Amra-Faye Wright as Velma
Kelly and Ian Kelsey as Billy Flynn. I was not disappointed in the
slightest, except from the fact "X Factor's" (a British "Pop Idol"
TV show - editor) Brenda was not in it on that particular night.
The humour throughout the show was great - Ian Kelsey certainly
provided great entertainment. Him and Jennifer were definitely the
best two in the show, although the dancers were extremely good. The
songs were electric also! I'm still smiling about it, want to see it
again tonight!
I was slightly worried about where we were sitting as it was row O
seats 7 and 8, but they were both very good seats, enabling us to
have a clear view of everything going on on stage. I was pleased
with the size of the theatre - I was convinced it would be too big
to see from everywhere, but I could confidently say that you could
see from anywhere, certainly in the stalls. I cant wait to see the
show again!
Danielle Knights,
Norwich
___________________
I went with a group of ten friends to see this show last night (1st
August 2006), and enjoyed it thoroughly. Both Amra Faye Wright and
Jennifer Ellison performed excellently, and we also had an
understudy for Mama Morton - a girl from the ensemble - but I
thought she was really good anyway. The rest of the cast and
ensemble were great too, so I didn't really understand why there was
no standing ovation.
We sat in the central block of the upper circle, row A. I'd seen
that this was coloured red according to theatremonkey but was
actually quite pleased. There is a safety bar which runs across the
front of your view, but sitting up straight and leaning slightly
forward, you pretty much eliminate it's effects. I was surprised how
far forward I felt, and how clearly I could see all the cast and
their facial expressions, the upper circle didn't seem as high as it
has done elsewhere either. I was a little worried about leaning,
because I wasn't sure how it would affect the view for those behind
us, but I guess as long as your aren't hanging right over it's
probably okay...
I would definitely recommend this show to anybody.
Chris
___________________
'Chicago' at the Cambridge was a distinct disappointment last night
(Monday 2 October 2006). I've seen the show a number of times, from
several viewings at the Cambridge of the original production in 1977
via a student version at the Embassy Theatre in Swiss Cottage to at
least five or six visits to the Adelphi. I thought the show, despite
its minimalist approach, looked quite cramped on the smallish stage
of the Cambridge, especially as all the male dancers seemed to be
particularly chunky. No problem with that, other than they needed a
bit more space to flex the highly developed muscles in every part of
their bodies!
I thought Ian Kelsey was the worst Billy Flynn I have ever seen. He
was extremely unsure vocally, generally lacked charisma and even
stage technique, and was left for dead by previous suave performers
of the role like Marti Pellow and even Darius Danesh! The climactic
moments of his three numbers ('All I Care About is Love', 'We Both
Reached for the Gun' and 'Razzle Dazzle') were simplified vocally
and movement-wise to the extent that, for me at least, they all fell
flat! The two women, Ashlee Simpson and Amra-Faye Wright, both
worked hard but lacked the vocal weight to make their numbers work
properly. Being able to dance is not enough, and Amra-Faye's
ridiculously fast and over-danced 'When Velma Takes the Stand' was
just ludicrous. I know this isn't her fault, but it's a plot song
and should be performed as such, not as a mad display of speeded up
eccentric dancing. In fact, the production seems to be paying less
and less attention to what's left of the script and concentrating on
who can dance the fastest! At least half of the girls in the Cell
Block Tango were inadequate when presenting their lyrics, and even
the Hungarian lady seemed ineffectual, and all she has to say is
'Not Geeeelty!' Also, the final 'Hot Honey Rag' seemed less
effective than I have seen it with other casts. Both ladies appeared
a bit tired, or maybe it was the choreography that was tired -- I'm
not sure which -- but it wasn't the joyous American
vaudeville-cum-burlesque end to the show that it seemed to be at the
Adelphi.
The good news is that the supporting players were good. I was
particularly impressed with Brenda Edwards as Mama Morton, who,
despite playing her first ever stage role, brought some very stylish
vocalising to 'When You're Good to Mama' and was fine in 'Class'.
Julian Sims was OK as Amos and CC Mullaney was an excellent Mary
Sunshine. Another complaint I have always had about the current
version of the show, although at some performances it hasn't
bothered me too much, is that 'Razzle Dazzle' should be the musical
heart of the whole piece, and it should be a wonderful production
number full of terpsichorean and theatrical magic. But here,
everything else that has gone before has been so over-choreographed
and over-performed that 'Razzle Dazzle' is done as a throw-away and
is now the framework for Roxie's trial, which is also turned into a
silly bit of slapstick! No, the truth is that the current production
is seriously flawed and needs stronger stars then Mr Kelsey and the
Misses Simpson and Wright to conceal its faults. I'm sure the large
number of people waiting at the stage door afterwards would disagree
with me, but the current cast is sadly not top drawer and their
shortcomings highlight what's wrong with the production!"
____________________
I have no idea how people could have possibly thought of anything
negative to say about Chicago and it's stars.
I have now seen the show 10 times in total (5 times when Bonnie
Langford was starring) and every single time I have loved it and
wanted to see it yet again! Bonnie was absolutely perfect for the
show, I can't understand why someone would think it was like
watching "your elderly aunt trying to sing and dance", she is a
total legend and can turn her hand to any kind of role. I also think
Amra-Faye Wright is amazing, she makes the dancing and sinking seem
effortless. I will certainly think twice about seeing it again now
that she has left the show. I believe that the ensemble cast were
also very versatile and talented, each time we have seen the show
they have changed to playing different parts which surely shows
their professionalism. I can not speak highly enough about the show,
you must see it soon!!
Emma
(Hampshire)
____________________
What a total disappointment!
Being a lovely girlfriend... I thought I would surprise my partner
for Christmas and bought her tickets for 'Chicago'...One of the
strongest performances and most seductively powerful stage
creations, Also the BIG bonus of Brenda Edwards playing Mama Morton
kind of made it LAW to go.
So finally 12th January 2007, we set off all excited to see our
Brenda do her thing, we loved her to bits on 'X Factor' 'n couldn't
wait to see her finally make the BIG TIME!.
Slightly shocked at the miniature Ladies room and the rather tatty
looking theatre itself we excitedly took our seats and looked around
the theatre taking it in. No sign of the Band...Hmmm Oddness.
All became crystal clear when the curtain went back....The stage was
small to say the least, but taking up two thirds of it was this
whacking great big tiered stage for the band.
Not to be put off we settled in with our drink 'n sweeties 'n
thought it can't be as bad as this really, can it?!, Oh how wrong we
were! The stage was no more than 10ft deep for the cast to move
about so made everything very tight and unnatural.
The main problem with the stage being pre-occupied by the band was
that left no space at all for scene change, so they didn't do ANY!,
or costume changes for that matter!, which was very confusing for me
as I had not seen 'Chicago' before so had very little idea what was
happening and where it was supposed to be happening... luckily my
partner has seen the movie so could be my guide so I had a clue what
was going on, otherwise I would have been totally lost.
BUT the biggest shock was yet to come, after all this waiting and to
be honest disappointment in the state of the theatre (that we had
thought, being in London and hosting a major leading headliner,
would have been of a decent standard)... To cap it all!....Brenda
was actually Ginger!, white and had a voice like a church
mouse!!!!!!.....my Nan can sing stronger than this woman and she has
passed to the other side!.
NO banner or notice or even a little whisper in our ear that OUR
STAR of the show was not going to be performing, when Mama Morton
came out the whole place went silent and all you could see was heads
turning to each other in disbelief and you should have heard it in
half time!, the conversations around us were of total shock and
disbelief. No prior notification in any way that Brenda would not be
appearing tonight. I did actually ask an attendant who said she had
phoned in sick, and of course this is not her fault (although most
inconsiderate on the night we came to see you Brenda, ya bad girl)
But they could have prepared us for the disappointment before we got
all worked up...It definitely affected how we felt and actually
considered leaving at half time as we were so fed up with the whole
thing.
But we did stay and stick it out, well we shouldn't have bothered to
be honest, the leading ladies were both totally weak and not at all
what one would think when you say CHICAGO, Sexy, etc etc etc...not
in the slightest!
We would still love to see 'Chicago' but now wonder where to go to
see it and if it's going to be worth bothering if they can't be
bothered to make an effort for us, No sets no costumes nothing!...My
school plays were more convincing than that lot.
Ho Hum....lesson learned...stick with Southampton's Mayflower
Theatre, we saw 'White Christmas' there and it was FAB!!!, amazing
sets convincing actors in fact all three of us ended up sobbing at
the end, and it has to be said it is a totally stunning theatre.
New Theatre goer in dismay,
Surrey, England.
__________________
(February 9, 2007). Chicago from stalls seat AA18 - front row,
middle seat, half price thanks to GILT - was pure luxury: Due to the
distance between the first row and the stage, you can actually lie
back and stretch your legs and take in the whole show as if you were
sitting in your sofa at home.
The show remains as excellent as ever - with or without the
occasional big stars. Speaking of which: Tony Hadley is probably one
of the stiffer Billy Flynns the show has seen, but he still sings
like a bird - not one false note to be heard.
__________________Musicals are not our favourite form of theatre,
but given a quiet Saturday night (10th March 2007) with nothing
booked in advance, and finding ourselves in the vicinity of the
Cambridge, we couldn't resist popping in to "check for returns."
Always worth while, if you are feeling undecided, and on this
occasion we picked up Stalls seats H16 and H17 - top price tickets
but good value, as we had an excellent view of entire stage. The
seats provided good leg room (we are both tall) and have the added
advantage of being aisle seats and pretty much centre stage.
There is very little spoken dialogue, but there are some good
voices, Tony Hadley (ex-Spandau Ballet) can still croon a good tune
(currently playing Billy Flynn). The two actors playing Roxie &
Velma certainly earn their money almost singing and dancing
non-stop. The set is minimal with no changes & costumes are in
monochrome but pretty (I enjoyed the dance with the large ostrich
fans).
The dancing is of the sort of standard you'd expect in the West End
and to be admired given the small area of stage in which the actors
were performing. Given the long run, Chicago must be doing lots of
things right and we left feeling "OK" but not much else. Husband
commented that the scantily clad women were "artistic," and from a
female perspective the male dancers had plenty to be admired! I
suspect this could be a good show for a Hen Party?
We did, however, find ourselves becoming increasingly worried that
Tony Hadley would collapse with heart failure. He is a large
gentleman and although it must be difficult to dance, when you are
not a trained dancer (we've tried ballroom, its not as easy as it
looks!!), his movements were a little wooden and he appeared to be
suffering badly from the heat of the stage lights.
Always better than "staying in" but not worthy of The Times comment
"The Most Exciting Musical Of Its Generation."
Ali P
____________________
This is my second viewing of Chicago, but my first time watching it at
the Cambridge Theatre during this April 2007 visit. It's my wife's first time
seeing Chicago so I warn her not to allow the black stage to skew her
perceptions of the musical -- "Just listen to the music and concentrate upon the
dancing" I tell her. And this is good advice for anyone going to see Chicago
because it really is all about music and dance supplemented by a burlesque
script.
The orchestra is in top form on this evening and one could conceivably focus
wholly upon the ragtime music and jazzy riffs of the very skilled musicians. But
Chicago is also about some fantastic dance. The black stage and stark
lighting actually help you to draw your focus upon the very fine and talented
dance troupe and soak up the haughty, leggy look of prohibition Chicago. I enjoy
my second viewing as the leads are at the top of their game this night and an
electric feeling flows between audience and cast. And yes, my wife also has a
great time marvelling at those precise dance steps. It's no surprise to me that
given this cast, script, and music that Chicago continues to draw strong
West End audiences. It's the sort of musical that one will want to revisit on
occasion just for the listening pleasure as well as the dance.
Our seats, in Dress Circle C18/19, were good seats, just as TM describes them.
Finding the theatre is a tricky proposition for the first time visitor. We
ourselves take an afternoon walk to scout out things so as to avoid the anxiety
of rushing to find the place since we're always running behind schedule. Turns
out to be a good move for as usual, we run late and have to dash down from
Tottenham and trot to the theatre, taking our seats two minutes before curtain.
Preparation paid off.
Barry Liimakka
Cinnaminson
USA
__________________
After reading good reviews about 'Chicago,' we decided we would take advantage
of half price tickets from the booth in Leicester Square. The seats in the
rear stalls were great and provided a good view of the stage.
Not as sexy as we thought it would be but on the whole a brilliant show with
wonderful dashes of comedy. Duncan James complemented it with his brilliant
voice.
Our rating: 5 out of 5. Fabulous!!!
Miles T
Age 14
_________________
My boyfriend and I saw the show on 30th August 2007. We were in seats AA22 and
AA23. It was absolutely FANTASTIC. Duncan James as Billy Flynn is amazing but
the rest of the cast are equally brilliant. Seeing it right on the front row was
also very special, you could virtually reach out and touch the cast (we didn't!)
and it was fascinating to have such a close-up view. The seats were comfortable
with lots of leg room. My boyfriend is not a fan of the theatre at all but he
hasn't stopped talking about it yet. If you can get to see this show, go and see
it, it's a real treat.
Nicky Lambert
_________________
|
